Ben Speakmon wrote:
I wasn't sure what to make of it either; the release docs don't mention it
specifically. The source and javadoc jars, BTW, are intended to be deployed
next to the final build in the maven repo. It won't be hard to make sure
they get in there. Is there a consensus that it's required for this release?
I don't have an official reference either, but I remember votes that
were canceled because of this. Here is an example for that I found in
the archives [1].
Oliver
[1]
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--3rd-attempt:-Release-commons-io-1.3.2-t3880798.html
On 9/24/07, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Everything looks good, except for one thing, which I think needs to be
fixed: the jar with the javadocs does not contain NOTICE.txt and
LICENSE.txt. (The jar with the sources contains these files, but they
are stored in the top level rather than in META-INF; don't know whether
this is problematic.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
