On 25.08.2007, at 15:21, Chr. Grobmeier wrote:
In fact, i compared the TrueZip implementation to Compress
yesterday.
We have quite less features and on some points in the code we depend
on java.util.zip packages.
Why is using java.uil.zip bad?
In some discussion in here people said that they wanted implementation
which is independent from java.util.zip. If that isn't the goal, than
things will be easier.
Ideally we could have two providers.
API design should be the first concern at this stage IMO. Everything
else will follow - I am sure.
OK. We had lots of discussions in the past about this. I made lots
of proposals
and thought about lots of comments in here. Now i feel a bit like at
the beginning.
I will digg into the code again and try to draw something or similar
so yo can get
an overview about whats going on with compress without diving deep
into the code.
That will make discussions easier.
I'll try to look into that again, too
cheers
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
