...but it would be still a bit of work. When I was
trying to add a new archiver implementation I was frustrated with
some of the details of the current API
I remember. Can you be more concrete? Maybe i can add some
improvements here.
Uff ...would love to help but this has already been a while. I'll try
to look into it again.
In fact, i compared the TrueZip implementation to Compress yesterday.
We have quite less features and on some points in the code we depend
on java.util.zip packages.
Why is using java.uil.zip bad?
Additionally i really don't like the coding style in f.e. the
zip-implementation. I would like to simplify that and make it more
readable.
Assuming we can realize your comments to the API, improving codestyle
and documentation, would this be enough to release this component?
API design should be the first concern at this stage IMO. Everything
else will follow - I am sure.
cheers
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
