Hello, João Considering the discussion we had in the thread[1] and that the conflicts will be mostly regarding loggers names (which is simple to fix), I am +1 on the proposal.
Best regards, Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi) [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/261j7m0p5mr4q7yclvo49mwhkxz4yov2 On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 1:28 PM João Jandre Paraquetti <j...@scclouds.com.br> wrote: > Hello guys, > > I am opening this voting thread as result of the discussion in thread > "ACS upgrade to Log4J2 version 2.19"[1]. > > The voting aims to continue the efforts and conclude the upgrade of the > ACS logging library to Log4j2 through PR 7131[2]; merge the PR as soon > as possible and provide ways to contributors solve the conflicts easily, > so all the contributors have time to fix their merge conflicts before > 4.19; announce that change in the release notes and provide ways to > users upgrade their customization made to the default log4j > configuration files. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Best regards, > João Jandre (JoaoJandre) > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/261j7m0p5mr4q7yclvo49mwhkxz4yov2 > [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7131 > >
