Hi Marcus, I'm not sure about others, I don't use docker so can't reply.
I like to build/develop/run/debug management server process outside of docker; just using mvn with an IDE for code-development and for attaching remote socket for breakpoints and debugging. I use mbx to create dev boxes (https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx), essentially the hypervisor alone runs as a nested VM but my mgmt server, MySQL server and NFS storage is all on my workstation. Regards. ________________________________ From: Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 03:00 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: Docker images I take the silence to perhaps mean that nobody is actively using the Docker image tooling, but maybe the conference was just too much of a distraction last week :-) Mainly I'm just wondering if I should be trying to improve the old stuff, or leaving it be and adding a new Dockerfile. The marvin bit is secondary. On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:15 AM Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, I've been familiarizing myself with the Docker image tooling in > CloudStack, and I have a few questions. I've been playing with a > multi-stage build that shrinks the image from ~4Gi to ~800Mi, packages just > the jar, some UI, and a JDK thinking that it might be more usable. > > 1) Is there anyone actively using these Dockerfiles? It might be > interesting to know what workflows they're a part of and whether they can > be changed or if new files should be created. > > 2) I see the Dockerfile.marvin points to a 'builds.cloudstack.org' to > pull a Marvin bundle, which seems to be down. Do these artifacts need to > be moved to 'download.cloudstack.org' or is this just a temporary > outage, or is it only reachable from CI? I do see the 'latest' tag > pulls (which is three years old). >
