I take the silence to perhaps mean that nobody is actively using the Docker image tooling, but maybe the conference was just too much of a distraction last week :-)
Mainly I'm just wondering if I should be trying to improve the old stuff, or leaving it be and adding a new Dockerfile. The marvin bit is secondary. On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:15 AM Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, I've been familiarizing myself with the Docker image tooling in > CloudStack, and I have a few questions. I've been playing with a > multi-stage build that shrinks the image from ~4Gi to ~800Mi, packages just > the jar, some UI, and a JDK thinking that it might be more usable. > > 1) Is there anyone actively using these Dockerfiles? It might be > interesting to know what workflows they're a part of and whether they can > be changed or if new files should be created. > > 2) I see the Dockerfile.marvin points to a 'builds.cloudstack.org' to > pull a Marvin bundle, which seems to be down. Do these artifacts need to > be moved to 'download.cloudstack.org' or is this just a temporary > outage, or is it only reachable from CI? I do see the 'latest' tag > pulls (which is three years old). >
