agree ! that's nice. -Wei
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 11:05, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > > On 1/27/21 12:18 AM, Niclas Lindblom wrote: > > I can confirm that the Terraform plugin is working if it is already > installed, since it was archived it no longer automatically downloads when > applying unless manually installed. > > > > From the Hashicorp website, it appears it was archived when they moved > all plugins to their registry and needs an owner and an email to Hashicorp > to be moved into to the registry and supported again when running > Terraform. I use it regularly but haven’t got the technical skills to > maintain the code so been hoping this would be resolved. > > > > I mailed Hashicorp to ask about this: > > "Thanks for reaching out. The provider was archived because we launched > the Terraform Registry last year which allows vendors to host and > publish their own providers. We'd be happy to work with you to transfer > the repository over to a CloudStack Github organization where you can > build and publish releases to the registry. > > We'd also like to have CloudStack join our Technology partnership > program so I can mark your Terraform provider as verified." > > So I think we don't need to do much technology-wise. > > I don't use Terraform and don't have a major stake in it, but I would > hate to see the Provider being removed from Terraform. > > Should we request https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform at > infra and then host the Provider there? > > Wido > > > Niclas > > > >> On 26 Jan 2021, at 18:33, christian.nieph...@zv.fraunhofer.de wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 26. Jan 2021, at 10:45, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 1/26/21 10:40 AM, christian.nieph...@zv.fraunhofer.de wrote: > >>>> On 25. Jan 2021, at 12:40, Abhishek Kumar < > abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> > >>>>> Terraform CoudStack provider by Hashicorp is archived here > https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-cloudstack > >>>>> > >>>>> Is anyone using or maintaining it? > >>>> > >>>> We are also using it heavily and are somewhat worried about the > module being archived. > >>> > >>> Agreed. But do we know why this has been done? What needs to be done to > >>> un-archive it? > >>> > >>> If it's just a matter of some love and attention we can maybe arrange > >>> something. > >>> > >>> Is it technically broken or just abandoned? > >> > >> This is just an educated guess, but given that we're not experiencing > any technical issues, I believe it has just been abandoned. > >> > >> Christian > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Wido > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> We're aware of Ansible CloudStack module ( > https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/scenario_guides/guide_cloudstack.html) > but are there any other alternatives of Terraform that you may be using > with CloudStack? > >>>> > >>>> The ansible module is working quite well. However, one of the > advantage of terraform imho is that one can easily destroy defined > infrastructure with one command, while with ansible 'the destrcution' needs > to be implemented in the playbook. Another advantage is that (at least) > Gitlab can now maintain terraform states, which quite nicely supports > GitOps approaches. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, Christian > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Abhishek > >>>>> > >>>>> abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com > >>>>> www.shapeblue.com > >>>>> 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK > >>>>> @shapeblue > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > > >
