> On 26. Jan 2021, at 10:45, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > > > On 1/26/21 10:40 AM, christian.nieph...@zv.fraunhofer.de wrote: >> On 25. Jan 2021, at 12:40, Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Terraform CoudStack provider by Hashicorp is archived here >>> https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-cloudstack >>> >>> Is anyone using or maintaining it? >> >> We are also using it heavily and are somewhat worried about the module being >> archived. > > Agreed. But do we know why this has been done? What needs to be done to > un-archive it? > > If it's just a matter of some love and attention we can maybe arrange > something. > > Is it technically broken or just abandoned?
This is just an educated guess, but given that we're not experiencing any technical issues, I believe it has just been abandoned. Christian > > Wido > >> >>> We're aware of Ansible CloudStack module >>> (https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/scenario_guides/guide_cloudstack.html) >>> but are there any other alternatives of Terraform that you may be using >>> with CloudStack? >> >> The ansible module is working quite well. However, one of the advantage of >> terraform imho is that one can easily destroy defined infrastructure with >> one command, while with ansible 'the destrcution' needs to be implemented in >> the playbook. Another advantage is that (at least) Gitlab can now maintain >> terraform states, which quite nicely supports GitOps approaches. >> >> Cheers, Christian >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Abhishek >>> >>> abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com >>> www.shapeblue.com >>> 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
