Happy New Year to all, I think we have a release but I'll wait to tally
votes until Monday. Enjoy your weekend and the coming year.

On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, 15:10 Boris Stoyanov, <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> In shared effort with Vladimir Petrov, we've done upgrade testing from
> latest of:
> 4.11
> 4.13
> 4.14
>
> Also did a basic lifecycle operations of:
> VMs, Networks, Storage, Infra(pod, cluster, zone, hosts).
>
> And we couldn't find any stopping issues with this RC.
>
> Thanks,
> Bobby.
>
> On 24.12.20, 5:14, "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
>
>     All,
>
>     Here are the convenience packages build from 4.15.0.0-RC3 if you don't
> want to build CloudStack from the source artifacts:
>
>     Packages: (Debian, CentOS7, and CentOS8)
>     http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.15.0.0-rc3/
>
>     4.15 systemvmtemplate:
>     http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.15/
>
>     Build from the master branch of
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation (if/after voting
> passes, we'll update and publish the docs):
>     http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/master/upgrading/
>
>     Additional notes:
>       *   The new UI is bundled within the cloudstack-management package
> and is shipped as the default UI served at <host:8080>/client, old UI will
> be served via <host:8080>/client/legacy. Most users don't need to do any
> separate installation or perform an installation step.
>       *   We've added support for CentOS8 with 4.15 but CentOS8 will EOL
> in Dec 2021 (https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product).
>
>
>     Regards.
>
>     ________________________________
>     From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>     Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 23:13
>     To: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>; dev <
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
>     Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
>     LS,
>     After fixing another few blockers, we have an RC3, The changes (other
> than
>     bundling) are mostly interesting for those working with templates and
> on
>     vmware.
>
>     We are voting for the new UI and the main code.
>
>     The candidate release branch is 4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632. The UI is
> still
>     separate but as agreed upon before this will be merged in coming
> releases,
>     at least from a version management point of view.
>     I've created a 4.15.0.0 release candidate, with the following
> artifacts up
>     for a vote:Git Branches:
>     main code:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632
>     <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201214T1124
> >
>     ui code:
>     <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/1.0
> >
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0
>     and Commit SH:
>     main code: 01b3e361c7bb81fd1ea822faddd6594e52bb00c1
>     ui code: 0593302dd53ac3203d3ab43b62d890605910f3e1
>
>     Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>     location):
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.15.0.0/ (rev.
> 45059)
>     PGP release keys (signed using 7975062401944786):
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYSVote will
> be open
>     for (at least) 72 hours.For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC
> members
>     please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?[ ] +1 approve
>     [ ] +0 no opinion
>     [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>     I will work with community members to provide convenience packaging
> over
>     the next few days.
>     The documentation repo will be updated as we move along.
>
>
>
>     --
>     Daan
>
>     rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>     www.shapeblue.com
>     3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
>     @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
>
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to