Hi Daan,

Appreciate this – but we have to take the use case and audience into account. 
If we are to include templates like we have done in the past then the purpose 
for those is to give end users a starting point for free and without having to 
spin up their own templates. We can and should have a discussion around this – 
but as a starting point I would say they need to be:

- A server OS 
- License free
- Ready to host light workloads with a few install steps – MySQL, Nginx, etc.

So – in my opinion this points to either a minimal CentOS or Ubuntu server 
template – and my vote would be for CentOS7. Machninia is great by all means – 
and it helps us techies and developers out - but it’s built to be a lightweight 
test bench and doesn’t really give the end user value.

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 12/07/2018, 11:12, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:

    sorry, if I wasn't clear Dag. I meant to say let's add macchinina. My
    preference for a heavy weight would be fedora btw, however macchinina suits
    my needs in many cases. It is very small and is not hurting anyone if we
    include it.
    
    On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com>
    wrote:
    
    > +1 for updating to CentOS7
    > -1 for Machinina – they are great for quickly spinning up a basic VM, but
    > personally I find them too limited when I want to just get a VM up and
    > quickly install some tools for a demo or test.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Dag Sonstebo
    > Cloud Architect
    > ShapeBlue
    >
    > On 10/07/2018, 21:08, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >     how about the macchinina images as build in? At least for development
    > those
    >     are very convenient.
    >
    >     On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <
    >     gabrasc...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >     > You are right Rafael, I was not clear with the "*(KVM)*". The idea
    > would be
    >     > to update others as well ;)
    >     >
    >     > 2018-07-10 16:34 GMT-03:00 Rafael Weingärtner <
    > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
    >     > >:
    >     >
    >     > > That looks a good idea, to at least, update the current default
    > template
    >     > > that we ship in. However, we should update not only the KVM
    > template, but
    >     > > also XenServer and VMware, right?
    >     > > Can we host image for these operating systems? The CentOS 5.5
    > images are
    >     > > being hosted at http://download.cloudstack.org.
    >     > >
    >     > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <
    >     > > gabrasc...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >     > >
    >     > > > Hello,
    >     > > >
    >     > > > I would like to propose updating our current default VM template
    >     > "CentOS
    >     > > > 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM)" to a newer version (e.g. CentOS 7). I
    > also
    >     > > think
    >     > > > that we could benefit from a wider set of templates offering 
also
    >     > Debian,
    >     > > > Ubuntu, and Fedora.
    >     > > >
    >     > > > Cheers,
    >     > > > Gabriel.
    >     > > >
    >     > >
    >     > >
    >     > >
    >     > > --
    >     > > Rafael Weingärtner
    >     > >
    >     >
    >
    >
    >
    >     --
    >     Daan
    >
    >
    >
    > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
    > www.shapeblue.com
    > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
    > @shapeblue
    >
    >
    >
    >
    
    
    -- 
    Daan
    


dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Reply via email to