I agree with Remi that it makes sense to separate packaging from the actual product.
Erik Den fredag 6. november 2015 skrev Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> følgende: > Hi Paul, > > I just tried it, see the same message but also see it actually works. > Management server starts and I can see the UI and work from that. I don’t > see this as a blocking issue. > > On a more generic note, I think we need to move the packaging scripts to > their own repository and iterate them separately from CloudStack itself. > The ASF doesn’t deliver the packages anyway, so we better make it more > flexible. The packaging scripts now compile the source. We should put our > artifacts on Maven Central and use those in the packaging instead. > > Any change on the packaging needs to be automatically tested (including > installs) so we prevent ending up in this situation. > > If we do this, we will have cloudstack-management-4.6.0-0 packages, make a > fix to them and we’ll have cloudstack-management-4.6.0-1, etc. Package > managers know very well how to handle this. The problems found now, can be > addressed separately and make a new package, as the CloudStack code itself > doesn’t change. > > TL;DR CloudStack is fine, hence it has never been in such a good shape. > @all please continue the testing. > > > Regards, > Remi > > > On 06/11/15 16:00, "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > >The messages plainly say that: > > > >Configure CloudStack Management Server ...[Failed] > > > >That is showing an error. > > > >It then says that it successfully rolled back. > > > >Restore Firewall ... [OK] > >Restore CloudStack Management Server ...[OK] > > > >You then restart it yourself manually after forcing https > > > >systemctl restart cloudstack-management > > > > > >IMO that is not an acceptable user experience. > > > >If there are missing files and incorrect links due to CentOS 7 using > tomcat7 then they need to be added to the packaging before the issue can be > said to be fixed. > >This is why it was taking me so long to untangle all of the changes > required for centos7. > > > >serviceConfigServer.py (deal with tomcat6&7 + sudoers) > >syscfg.py (system for rhel7 for *server* not included) > >and /packaging/centos7/cloud.spec (tomcat7 conf files need adding) > > > > > >Regards, > > > >Paul Angus > >VP Technology/Cloud Architect > >S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus > >paul.an...@shapeblue.com <javascript:;> > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: David Amorim da Cruz Faria [mailto:da...@amorim-cruz.net > <javascript:;>] > >Sent: 06 November 2015 14:36 > >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;> > >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > > > >Hi Paul, > > > >the cloudstack-setup-management tool exits without error and the > management server starts fine. > >These files are currently missing from packaging/centos7/tomcat7 but are > used by the tool. > > > >[root@mgmt01 ~]# cloudstack-setup-management Starting to configure > CloudStack Management Server: > >Configure Firewall ... [OK] > >Configure CloudStack Management Server ...[Failed] Cannot find > /etc/cloudstack/management/server-nonssl.xml or > /etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6-nonssl.conf, https enables failed Try to > restore your system: > >Restore Firewall ... [OK] > >Restore CloudStack Management Server ...[OK] > > > >[root@mgmt01 ~]# echo $? > >0 > > > >[root@mgmt01 ~]# cloudstack-setup-management --https Starting to > configure CloudStack Management Server: > >Configure Firewall ... [OK] > >Configure CloudStack Management Server ...[Failed] Cannot find > /etc/cloudstack/management/server-ssl.xml or > /etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6-ssl.conf, https enables failed Try to > restore your system: > >Restore Firewall ... [OK] > >Restore CloudStack Management Server ...[OK] > > > >[root@mgmt01 ~]# echo $? > >0 > > > >[root@mgmt01 ~]# systemctl restart cloudstack-management > > > >[root@mgmt01 ~]# systemctl status cloudstack-management -l > cloudstack-management.service - CloudStack Management Server > > Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/cloudstack-management.service; > >enabled) > > Active: active (running) since vr 2015-11-06 14:31:15 UTC; 11s ago > > Process: 4475 ExecStop=/usr/libexec/tomcat/server stop (code=exited, > >status=0/SUCCESS) > > Main PID: 4530 (java) > > CGroup: /system.slice/cloudstack-management.service > > └─4530 java -Djava.awt.headless=true > -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote=false -Xmx2g -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError > -XX:HeapDumpPath=/var/log/cloudstack/management/ -XX:PermSize=512M > -XX:MaxPermSize=800m -classpath > /etc/cloudstack/management:/usr/share/cloudstack-common:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup:/usr/share/java/mysql-connector-java.jar:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/bin/bootstrap.jar:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/bin/tomcat-juli.jar:/usr/share/java/commons-daemon.jar > >-Dcatalina.base=/usr/share/cloudstack-management > >-Dcatalina.home=/usr/share/cloudstack-management -Djava.endorsed.dirs= > -Djava.io.tmpdir=/usr/share/cloudstack-management/temp > > >-Djava.util.logging.config.file=/usr/share/cloudstack-management/conf/logging.properties > >-Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager > >org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start > > > >[lots of irrelevant stuff] > > > >From /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log: > >2015-11-06 14:33:46,288 DEBUG [c.c.a.ClusterAlertAdapter] > >(Cluster-Notification-1:ctx-dd28a932) Management server n ode 10.13.95.31 > is up, send alert > > > > > > > >Regards, > >David Amorim Faria > > > >On 6 November 2015 at 14:49, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >> Sorry guys. CentOS 7 install is NOT fixed in 4.6.0-RC20151104T1522. > >> > >> > >> Sorry had to fly out to client in Kenya, so not been able to work on > >> it recently. > >> > >> -1 > >> > >> [root@CentOS7ACSTest ~]# cloudstack-setup-management Starting to > >> configure CloudStack Management Server: > >> Configure Firewall ... [OK] > >> Configure CloudStack Management Server ...[Failed] Cannot find > >> /etc/cloudstack/management/server-nonssl.xml or > >> /etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6-nonssl.conf, https enables failed > >> Try to restore your system: > >> Restore Firewall ... [OK] > >> Restore CloudStack Management Server ...[OK] > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Paul Angus > >> VP Technology/Cloud Architect > >> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus > >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com <javascript:;> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;>] > >> Sent: 06 November 2015 13:33 > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > >> > >> Hi Raja, > >> > >> Thanks for the report. Most of these seem test-case related. For any > >> issue you doubt this, can you please verify them manually? > >> > >> If it doesn’t work, please file a Jira issue (with details and stept) > >> and set it to critical. It will then show up on the list of issues and > >> we can discuss how to proceed. > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12332940 (requires > >> login) > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Remi > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 06/11/15 12:07, "Raja Pullela" <raja.pull...@citrix.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > >> >Here is the BVT report on the RC > >> >KVM Basic – 98.6% , one test failed//test case issue KVM Adv – 96.3%, > >> >four tests failed //couple due to VM deployment and couple due to > >> >test case issue XS Basic – 97.2%, two tests failed//test case issues > >> >XS Adv – 93.5%, seven tests failed //4 due to VM deployment and 3 due > >> >to test case issues HyperV – 93.3%, seven tests failed Simulator – > >> >need to run them… will report later today/tomorrow. > >> > > >> > > >> >Failed test cases: > >> >· > >> > >> integration.smoke.test_vpc_vpn.TestVpcRemoteAccessVpn.test_vpc_remote_ > >> access_vpn > >> //failed due to VM deployment > >> >· > >> > >> integration.smoke.test_vpc_vpn.TestVpcSite2SiteVpn.test_vpc_site2site_ > >> vpn > >> //failed due to VM deployment > >> >· > >> > >> integration.smoke.test_internal_lb.TestInternalLb.test02_internallb_ha > >> proxy_stats_on_all_interfaces > >> //failed due to VM deployment > >> >· > >> > >> integration.smoke.test_internal_lb.TestInternalLb.test_01_internallb_r > >> oundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 > >> //failed due to VM deployment > >> >· > >> > >> integration.smoke.test_over_provisioning.TestUpdateOverProvision.test_ > >> UpdateStorageOverProvisioningFactor > >> //test case issue > >> >· > >> > >> integration.smoke.test_vm_snapshots.TestSnapshots.test_01_test_vm_volu > >> me_snapshot > >> //test case issue > >> >· integration.smoke.test_iso.TestISO.test_07_list_default_iso > >> //test case issue > >> ><nose.suite.ContextSuite context=TestNiciraContoller>:setup //test > >> >case issue > >> > > >> >From: Raja Pullela [mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com <javascript:;>] > >> >Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 4:30 PM > >> >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;> > >> >Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > >> > > >> > > >> >Here is the BVT report on the RC - > >> > > >> >[cid:image001.png@01D118B0.21037340] > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com > <javascript:;>] > >> >Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 4:19 PM > >> >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>> > >> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >Thanks again, Lucian! > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >I’m already working on 9015 and testing few things, hope to get it > >> >fixed > >> soon, but not for 4.6.0. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >If we kan keep the good work in terms of writing/executing tests - > >> >which > >> will help keeping Master stable - and also avoid merges that don’t > >> follow the rule(*), we can have a 4.6.1/4.7.0 (new features) within > >> two month from now. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >So, let us all keep the great work concerning tests/quality/stability. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >Cheers, > >> > > >> >Wilder > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >* 2 LGTMs + tests (written/executed) > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> On 06 Nov 2015, at 10:49, Nux! > >> >> <n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;><mailto:n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;>>> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> Well, IMHO the 2 issues are not big problems: > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> 9015 - it sounds somewhat serious, I'll try to test these days what > >> > > >> >> happens if one of the VRs crashes, that's when we'd need redundancy > >> >> in > >> > > >> >> a more "real" scenario, if we could get this fixed before release > >> >> it'd > >> > > >> >> be ideal, Remi should know more re correct procedure here > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> 9035 - sounds like a non-issue to me, if I want to reset the > >> >> password > >> and the backup router does what it's told, then I don't care it > >> doesn't have the old passwords from the other router cached. This > >> could impact instance deployments or passwd resets right in the time > >> BACKUP becomes MASTER. How long is this generally? > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> Lucian > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> -- > >> > > >> >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> Nux! > >> > > >> >> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > >> >>> From: "Wilder Rodrigues" > >> >>> <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;><mailto: > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.co <javascript:;> > >> >>> m> > >> >>> > > >> > > >> >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>> > >> > > >> >>> Sent: Friday, 6 November, 2015 09:29:56 > >> > > >> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >>> Thanks for the clear message, Lucian. I really appreciated that. > >> >>> :) > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> It’s about the Redundant VPC, not the single one - which is > >> >>> working > >> > > >> >>> pretty fine, btw! > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Open issues are: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9015 > >> > > >> >>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9035 > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> And I have to write tests to cover Private Gateway and S2S VPN for > >> > > >> >>> Redundant VPC. > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> All the rest working fine, as you have seen in my report. > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Cheers, > >> > > >> >>> Wilder > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> On 06 Nov 2015, at 10:19, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;> > <mailto:n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;> > >> <mailto:n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;>%3cmailto:n...@li.nux.ro > <javascript:;>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Well, in my non-coder opinion, we should not deliver broken > >> >>> software, > >> > > >> >>> however we saw in the past fixing it all delayed release > considerably. > >> > > >> >>> Now, how broken is that VPC? :) > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> -- > >> > > >> >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Nux! > >> > > >> >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro%3chttp:/www.nux.ro> > >> >>> > > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > >> >>> From: "Wilder Rodrigues" > >> >>> <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;><mailto: > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.co <javascript:;> > >> >>> m> > >> >>> > > >> > > >> >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>> > >> > > >> >>> Sent: Friday, 6 November, 2015 08:57:56 > >> > > >> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> I forgot to mention that for the failed rVPC test I followed the > >> >>> same > >> > > >> >>> steps manually and it worked as expected. > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> In addition, I would like to hear from the community what should > >> >>> we > >> > > >> >>> do in terms of minor/major bugs in new features (like the rVPC). > >> >>> Will > >> > > >> >>> those be fix and added to a 4.6.1 or should it still be part of > 4.6.0? > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Cheers, > >> > > >> >>> Wilder > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> On 06 Nov 2015, at 09:17, Wilder Rodrigues > >> > > >> >>> <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;><mailto: > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.co <javascript:;> > >> >>> m > >> <mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;>% > >> 3cmailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Hi all, > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> My considerations after the tests agains XenServer 6.2: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> We got 4 failures whilst testing against Xen62: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> * test_vpc_redundant.py on line 522 > >> > > >> >>> - AssertionError: No Master or too many master routers found 0 > >> > > >> >>> * test_internal_lb.py lines 712 and 576, when trying to deploy a > >> > > >> >>> virtual machine > >> > > >> >>> - Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-36-89-VM] > >> > > >> >>> - Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-36-91-VM] > >> > > >> >>> * test_vpc_vpn.py line 604 for the same reason as above > >> > > >> >>> - Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-37-95-VM] > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> There are bugs in the test_vpc_vpn.py VPN test: in case of > >> >>> failures, > >> > > >> >>> when we reach either line 604 or 624, it will try to assert the > >> >>> state > >> > > >> >>> of the variable vm1/vm2, but is has not been assigned yet, which > >> > > >> >>> makes us face an Unbound > >> > > >> >>> Error: > >> > > >> >>> - UnboundLocalError: local variable 'vm1' referenced before > >> > > >> >>> assignment > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Looking at the code I noticed that the same will happen for vm2, > >> >>> in > >> > > >> >>> case vm1 deployment passes but vm1 doesn’t. > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Concerning the LB and VPN tests, those failed due to a wrong > >> > > >> >>> template. Those tests should be executed against KVM only as they > >> > > >> >>> have a configuration which depends on KVM hypervisors > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> ``` > >> > > >> >>> "default_hypervisor": "kvm", > >> > > >> >>> "compute_offering": { > >> > > >> >>> "name": "Tiny Instance", > >> > > >> >>> "displaytext": "Tiny Instance", > >> > > >> >>> "cpunumber": 1, > >> > > >> >>> "cpuspeed": 100, > >> > > >> >>> "memory": 128, > >> > > >> >>> } > >> > > >> >>> ``` > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> But I will change that. > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Concerning the redundant VPC test that failed, it was due an > >> >>> absence > >> > > >> >>> of a master router. For some reason, after the > >> > > >> >>> self.delete_nat_rules() was called, the router switched from > >> >>> Master > >> > > >> >>> to Backup, which caused the error. I will investigate. > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> There was also a problem reported by Boris concerning the DEB > >> > > >> >>> packages, which he already has a PR for ==> > >> > > >> >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1040. This is package > >> > > >> >>> related, thus I don’t see it as a blocker for the release, hence > >> >>> my > >> > > >> >>> +1. > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> ::: Full Report ::: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> :: Environment 1 :: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> * Hardware required: TRUE > >> > > >> >>> * Management Server + MySQL on CentOS 7.1 > >> > > >> >>> * Two XenServer 6.2 hosts > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> :: Tests Suites Executed :: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> nosetests --with-marvin > >> > > >> >>> --marvin-config=/data/shared/marvin/mct-zone1-xen1-ISOLATED.cfg -s > >> >>> -a > >> > > >> >>> tags=advanced,required_hardware=true > >> >>> component/test_vpc_redundant.py > >> > > >> >>> component/test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py > >> > > >> >>> component/test_routers_network_ops.py > >> > > >> >>> component/test_vpc_router_nics.py > >> >>> component/test_password_server.py > >> > > >> >>> component/test_router_dhcphosts.py > >> > > >> >>> smoke/test_loadbalance.py smoke/test_internal_lb.py > >> > > >> >>> smoke/test_ssvm.py smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py smoke/test_network.py > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> :: Environment 2 :: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> * Hardware required: FALSE > >> > > >> >>> * Management Server + MySQL on CentOS 7.1 > >> > > >> >>> * Two XenServer 6.2 hosts > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> :: Tests Suites Executed :: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> nosetests --with-marvin > >> > > >> >>> --marvin-config=/data/shared/marvin/mct-zone1-xen1-ISOLATED.cfg -s > >> >>> -a > >> > > >> >>> tags=advanced,required_hardware=false smoke/test_routers.py > >> > > >> >>> smoke/test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py smoke/test_vm_life_cycle.py > >> > > >> >>> component/test_vpc_routers.py smoke/test_service_offerings.py > >> > > >> >>> component/test_vpc_offerings.py smoke/test_network_acl.py > >> > > >> >>> smoke/test_privategw_acl.py smoke/test_network.py > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> :: Summary :: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> * Tests executes: 75 > >> > > >> >>> * Successfull tests: 72 > >> > > >> >>> * Skipped tests: 6(*) > >> > > >> >>> * Failed tests: 5(**) > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> (*) Tests were skipped because I had 2 hosts and the current logic > >> >>> in > >> > > >> >>> the tests does not cope with that: it lists the hosts and takes > >> >>> the > >> > > >> >>> one in index zero > >> > > >> >>> - host = hosts[0] > >> > > >> >>> (**) Failures and Exceptions being taken into counted > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> :: Test results for Environment 1 :: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each > >> >>> network > >> > > >> >>> ... === > >> > > >> >>> TestName: test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | > >> Status : > >> > > >> >>> FAILED === > >> > > >> >>> FAIL > >> > > >> >>> Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each > >> >>> network > >> > > >> >>> and check default routes ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no > >> >>> host > >> > > >> >>> credentials to check router services Test iptables default > >> > > >> >>> INPUT/FORWARD policy on RouterVM ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_02_routervm_iptables_policies | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > >> > > >> >>> iptables default INPUT/FORWARD policies on VPC router ... === > TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_01_single_VPC_iptables_policies | Status : SUCCESS === ok > >> >>> Test > >> > > >> >>> redundant router internals ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true | Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === ok Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_02_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_false | Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === ok Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true | Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === ok Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false | Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === ok Create a VPC with two networks with one VM in each > >> > > >> >>> network and test nics after destroy ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Status : SUCCESS === ok Create a > >> >>> VPC > >> > > >> >>> with two networks with one VM in each network and test default > >> >>> routes > >> > > >> >>> ... === TestName: test_02_VPC_default_routes | Status : SUCCESS > >> >>> === > >> > > >> >>> ok Check the password file in the Router VM ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_isolate_network_password_server | Status : SUCCESS === ok > >> >>> Check > >> > > >> >>> that the /etc/dhcphosts.txt doesn't contain duplicate IPs ... === > >> > > >> >>> TestName: test_router_dhcphosts | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to > >> > > >> >>> create Load balancing rule with source NAT ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_01_create_lb_rule_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to > >> > > >> >>> create Load balancing rule with non source NAT ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_02_create_lb_rule_non_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test for > >> > > >> >>> assign & removing load balancing rule ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_assign_and_removal_lb | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to > >> >>> verify > >> > > >> >>> access to loadbalancer haproxy admin stats page ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test02_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | Status : > >> > > >> >>> EXCEPTION === ERROR Test create, assign, remove of an Internal LB > >> > > >> >>> with roundrobin http traffic to 3 vm's ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | Status : > >> > > >> >>> EXCEPTION === ERROR Test SSVM Internals ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_03_ssvm_internals | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test CPVM > >> >>> Internals > >> > > >> >>> ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host credentials to check > >> > > >> >>> router services Test stop SSVM ... === TestName: test_05_stop_ssvm > >> >>> | > >> > > >> >>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test stop CPVM ... SKIP: Marvin > >> >>> configuration > >> > > >> >>> has no host credentials to check router services Test reboot SSVM > ... > >> > > >> >>> === TestName: test_07_reboot_ssvm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > >> > > >> >>> reboot CPVM ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host credentials > >> >>> to > >> > > >> >>> check router services Test destroy SSVM ... SKIP: Marvin > >> > > >> >>> configuration has no host credentials to check router services > >> >>> Test > >> > > >> >>> destroy CPVM ... === TestName: test_10_destroy_cpvm | Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === ok Test Remote Access VPN in VPC ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Status : FAILED === FAIL Test VPN in > >> >>> VPC > >> > > >> >>> ... === TestName: test_vpc_site2site_vpn | Status : EXCEPTION === > >> > > >> >>> ERROR Test for port forwarding on source NAT ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_01_port_fwd_on_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test for > >> >>> port > >> > > >> >>> forwarding on non source NAT ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_02_port_fwd_on_non_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test for > >> > > >> >>> reboot router ... === TestName: test_reboot_router | Status : > >> >>> SUCCESS > >> > > >> >>> === ok Test for Router rules for network rules on acquired public > >> >>> IP > >> > > >> >>> ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_1_static_nat_rule | Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === ok Test for Router rules for network rules on acquired > >> > > >> >>> public IP ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_2_nat_rule | Status : > >> >>> SUCCESS > >> > > >> >>> === ok Test for Router rules for network rules on acquired public > >> >>> IP > >> > > >> >>> ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_3_Load_Balancer_Rule | Status > : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === ok > >> > > >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >>> -- > >> >>> - > >> > > >> >>> - > >> > > >> >>> Ran 33 tests in 9352.773s > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> FAILED (SKIP=5, errors=3, failures=2) > >> > > >> >>> (END) > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> :: Test results for Environment 2 :: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin configuration > >> >>> has no host > >> > > >> >>> credentials to check router services > >> > > >> >>> Test restart network ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status > >> > > >> >>> : SUCCESS === > >> > > >> >>> ok > >> > > >> >>> Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | > >> Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === > >> > > >> >>> ok > >> > > >> >>> Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: > >> >>> test_06_router_advanced | > >> Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === > >> > > >> >>> ok > >> > > >> >>> Test stop router ... === TestName: test_07_stop_router | Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === ok Test start router ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test reboot router > ... > >> > > >> >>> === TestName: test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > >> > > >> >>> reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test advanced > >> > > >> >>> zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | > >> > > >> >>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === > TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy > >> >>> Virtual > >> > > >> >>> Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : > >> >>> SUCCESS > >> > > >> >>> === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm > >> >>> | > >> > > >> >>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual > >> > > >> >>> Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === > >> > > >> >>> ok > >> > > >> >>> Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm > >> >>> | > >> Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === > >> > > >> >>> ok > >> > > >> >>> Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm > >> >>> | > >> Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === > >> > > >> >>> ok > >> > > >> >>> Test migrate VM ... === TestName: test_08_migrate_vm | Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === ok Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === > >> > > >> >>> TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > >> > > >> >>> start/stop of router after addition of one guest network ... === > >> TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_01_start_stop_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | > >> >>> Status > >> : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === > >> > > >> >>> ok > >> > > >> >>> Test reboot of router after addition of one guest network ... === > >> TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_02_reboot_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === ok Test to change service offering of router after > >> > > >> >>> addition of one guest network ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_04_chg_srv_off_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | > >> Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === > >> > > >> >>> ok > >> > > >> >>> Test destroy of router after addition of one guest network ... === > >> TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_05_destroy_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status > : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === ok Test to stop and start router after creation of VPC > >> > > >> >>> ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_01_stop_start_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS > >> >>> === > >> > > >> >>> ok Test to reboot the router after creating a VPC ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_02_reboot_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === ok > >> > > >> >>> Tests to change service offering of the Router after ... === > TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_04_change_service_offerring_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === ok > >> >>> Test > >> > > >> >>> to destroy the router after creating a VPC ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_05_destroy_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === > >> >>> ok > >> > > >> >>> Test to create service offering ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to > >> > > >> >>> update existing service offering ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to > >> > > >> >>> delete service offering ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > >> >>> create > >> > > >> >>> VPC offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_vpc_offering | > >> >>> Status > >> > > >> >>> : SUCCESS === > >> > > >> >>> ok > >> > > >> >>> Test VPC offering without load balancing service ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_03_vpc_off_without_lb | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPC > >> > > >> >>> offering without static NAT service ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_04_vpc_off_without_static_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > >> >>> VPC > >> > > >> >>> offering without port forwarding service ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_05_vpc_off_without_pf | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPC > >> > > >> >>> offering with invalid services ... === TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_06_vpc_off_invalid_services | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > >> > > >> >>> update VPC offering ... === TestName: test_07_update_vpc_off | > Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === > >> > > >> >>> ok > >> > > >> >>> Test list VPC offering ... === TestName: test_08_list_vpc_off | > >> > > >> >>> Status : SUCCESS === ok test_09_create_redundant_vpc_offering > >> > > >> >>> (integration.component.test_vpc_offerings.TestVPCOffering) ... === > >> TestName: > >> > > >> >>> test_09_create_redundant_vpc_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok > >> > > >> >>> test_privategw_acl > >> (integration.smoke.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... > >> > > >> >>> === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > >> >>> for > >> > > >> >>> delete account ... === TestName: test_delete_account | Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === ok Test for Associate/Disassociate public IP address > >> >>> for > >> > > >> >>> admin account ... === > >> > > >> >>> TestName: test_public_ip_admin_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok > >> >>> Test > >> > > >> >>> for Associate/Disassociate public IP address for user account ... > >> >>> === > >> > > >> >>> TestName: test_public_ip_user_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok > >> >>> Test > >> > > >> >>> for release public IP address ... === TestName: test_releaseIP | > >> Status : > >> > > >> >>> SUCCESS === > >> > > >> >>> ok > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >>> -- > >> >>> - > >> > > >> >>> - > >> > > >> >>> Ran 42 tests in 5463.487s > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> OK (SKIP=1) > >> > > >> >>> (END) > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> On 05 Nov 2015, at 20:13, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;> > <mailto:n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;> > >> <mailto:n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;>%3cmailto:n...@li.nux.ro > <javascript:;>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Installation on CentOS 6 mgmt and HVs worked great, added some > >> > > >> >>> templates, deployed some instances, no issues. > >> > > >> >>> I'll get back if I hit problems. > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Lucian > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> -- > >> > > >> >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Nux! > >> > > >> >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro/<http://www.nux.ro%3chttp:/www.nux.ro > >> >>> /> > >> >>> > > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > >> >>> From: "Nux!" > >> >>> <n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;><mailto:n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;> > <mailto:n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;>%3cmailto: > >> >>> nu > >> >>> x...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;>>>> > >> > > >> >>> To: > >> >>> dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > >> >>> de v...@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>% > 3cmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>> > >> > > >> >>> Sent: Thursday, 5 November, 2015 08:48:38 > >> > > >> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Thanks Remi! > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> -- > >> > > >> >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Nux! > >> > > >> >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro%3chttp:/www.nux.ro> > >> >>> > > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > >> >>> From: "Remi Bergsma" > >> > > >> >>> <rberg...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;><mailto: > rberg...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;><ma > >> >>> il > >> >>> to:rberg...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;>% > 3cmailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.co <javascript:;> > >> >>> m> > >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> To: > >> >>> dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > >> >>> de v...@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>% > 3cmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>> > >> > > >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, 4 November, 2015 20:45:59 > >> > > >> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Kicked off some Jenkins builds: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> CentOS 6 packages: > >> > > >> >>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/cloudstack-r > >> >>> pm > >> >>> - > >> > > >> >>> packages-with-branch-parameter/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/r > >> >>> pm > >> >>> b > >> > > >> >>> uild/RPMS/x86_64/ > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> CentOS 7 packages: > >> > > >> >>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/cloudstack-r > >> >>> pm > >> >>> - > >> > > >> >>> packages-with-branch-parameter-centos7/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifac > >> >>> t/ > >> >>> d > >> > > >> >>> ist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Ubuntu Trusty packages: > >> > > >> >>> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.6/pool/ > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> SystemVM template: > >> > > >> >>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/parameterize > >> >>> d- > >> >>> s > >> > > >> >>> ytemvm/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/ > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> You can always build packages from the source: > >> > > >> >>> cd packaging > >> > > >> >>> ./package.sh -h > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Happy testing! > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Regards, > >> > > >> >>> Remi > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> On 04/11/15 18:12, "Remi Bergsma" > >> > > >> >>> <rberg...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;><mailto: > rberg...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;> > >> <mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;> > %3cmailto:RBergsma@schubergphilis.c > >> om>>> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> The jobs failed due to the git clone failing (time out). I also > >> > > >> >>> experience it is quite slow at the moment. > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> It is mirrored here (same commit id): > >> > > >> >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Regards, > >> > > >> >>> Remi > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> On 04/11/15 17:17, "Rajani Karuturi" > >> > > >> >>> <rajani.karut...@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto: > rajani.karut...@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto: > >> rajani.karut...@citrix.com <javascript:;>% > 3cmailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com <javascript:;>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> I started jenkins builds for cloudstack RPM packages and systemvm > >> > > >> >>> templates for this branch here > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/cloudstack-r > >> >>> pm > >> >>> - > >> > > >> >>> packages-with-branch-parameter/19/console > >> > > >> >>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/parameterize > >> >>> d- > >> >>> s > >> > > >> >>> ytemvm/3/console > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> We can use them once the build is complete. > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> ~Rajani > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> On 04-Nov-2015, at 8:58 PM, Nux! > >> > > >> >>> <n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;><mailto:n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;> > <mailto:n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;>% > >> 3cmailto:n...@li.nux.ro <javascript:;>>><mailto:n...@li.nux.ro > <javascript:;>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Hi, > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Has jenkins built rpms for this somewhere? > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> -- > >> > > >> >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Nux! > >> > > >> >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro><http://www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro% > >> >>> 3c http:/www.nux.ro%3e%3chttp:/www.nux.ro>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > >> >>> From: "Remi Bergsma" > >> > > >> >>> <rberg...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;><mailto: > rberg...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;><ma > >> >>> il > >> >>> to:rberg...@schubergphilis.com <javascript:;>% > 3cmailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.co <javascript:;> > >> >>> m> > >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> To: > >> >>> dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > >> >>> de v...@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>% > 3cmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>> > >> > > >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, 4 November, 2015 14:55:11 > >> > > >> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Hi all, > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> I've created a 4.6.0 release candidate, with the following > >> >>> artifacts > >> > > >> >>> up for a > >> > > >> >>> vote: > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Git Branch and Commit SH: > >> > > >> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlo > >> >>> g; > >> >>> h > >> > > >> >>> =4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Commit: b0ebe68e375432b28eef031ab62ccd5831234c77 > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > >> > > >> >>> location): > >> > > >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.6.0/ > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F): > >> > > >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > >> > > >> >>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> [ ] +1 approve > >> > > >> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> > > >> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > > >> > > >> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related > >> services > >> > >> IaaS Cloud Design & Build< > >> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> > >> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment > >> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> > >> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> > >> CloudStack Software Engineering< > >> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/> > >> CloudStack Infrastructure Support< > >> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> > >> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses< > >> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > >> > >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are > >> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > >> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do > >> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related > >> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you > >> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show > >> it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have > >> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated > >> in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company > >> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue > >> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in > >> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA > >> Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is > traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered > trademark. > >> > >Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services > > > >IaaS Cloud Design & Build< > http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> > >CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> > >CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> > >CloudStack Software Engineering< > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/> > >CloudStack Infrastructure Support< > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> > >CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses< > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender > if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a > company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a > company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue > Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil > and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is > a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under > license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. >
