Same tomcat6 issue? --
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards, Boris Schrijver PCextreme B.V. http://www.pcextreme.nl/contact Tel direct: +31 6 33784542 > On November 6, 2015 at 2:49 PM Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > Sorry guys. CentOS 7 install is NOT fixed in 4.6.0-RC20151104T1522. > > > Sorry had to fly out to client in Kenya, so not been able to work on it > recently. > > -1 > > [root@CentOS7ACSTest ~]# cloudstack-setup-management > Starting to configure CloudStack Management Server: > Configure Firewall ... [OK] > Configure CloudStack Management Server ...[Failed] > Cannot find /etc/cloudstack/management/server-nonssl.xml or > /etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6-nonssl.conf, https enables failed > Try to restore your system: > Restore Firewall ... [OK] > Restore CloudStack Management Server ...[OK] > > > > > Regards, > > Paul Angus > VP Technology/Cloud Architect > S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: 06 November 2015 13:33 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > > Hi Raja, > > Thanks for the report. Most of these seem test-case related. For any issue you > doubt this, can you please verify them manually? > > If it doesn’t work, please file a Jira issue (with details and stept) and set > it to critical. It will then show up on the list of issues and we can discuss > how to proceed. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12332940 (requires login) > > > Regards, > Remi > > > > > On 06/11/15 12:07, "Raja Pullela" <raja.pull...@citrix.com> wrote: > > >Here is the BVT report on the RC > >KVM Basic – 98.6% , one test failed//test case issue KVM Adv – 96.3%, > >four tests failed //couple due to VM deployment and couple due to test > >case issue XS Basic – 97.2%, two tests failed//test case issues XS Adv > >– 93.5%, seven tests failed //4 due to VM deployment and 3 due to test > >case issues HyperV – 93.3%, seven tests failed Simulator – need to run > >them… will report later today/tomorrow. > > > > > >Failed test cases: > >· > > > > integration.smoke.test_vpc_vpn.TestVpcRemoteAccessVpn.test_vpc_remote_access_vpn > >//failed due to VM deployment > >· > > > > integration.smoke.test_vpc_vpn.TestVpcSite2SiteVpn.test_vpc_site2site_vpn > >//failed due to VM deployment > >· > > > > integration.smoke.test_internal_lb.TestInternalLb.test02_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces > >//failed due to VM deployment > >· > > > > integration.smoke.test_internal_lb.TestInternalLb.test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 > >//failed due to VM deployment > >· > > > > integration.smoke.test_over_provisioning.TestUpdateOverProvision.test_UpdateStorageOverProvisioningFactor > >//test case issue > >· > > > > integration.smoke.test_vm_snapshots.TestSnapshots.test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot > >//test case issue > >· integration.smoke.test_iso.TestISO.test_07_list_default_iso //test > >case issue > ><nose.suite.ContextSuite context=TestNiciraContoller>:setup //test > >case issue > > > >From: Raja Pullela [mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com] > >Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 4:30 PM > >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > > > > > >Here is the BVT report on the RC - > > > >[cid:image001.png@01D118B0.21037340] > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com] > >Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 4:19 PM > >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > > > > > > > >Thanks again, Lucian! > > > > > > > >I’m already working on 9015 and testing few things, hope to get it fixed > >soon, but not for 4.6.0. > > > > > > > >If we kan keep the good work in terms of writing/executing tests - which will > >help keeping Master stable - and also avoid merges that don’t follow the > >rule(*), we can have a 4.6.1/4.7.0 (new features) within two month from now. > > > > > > > >So, let us all keep the great work concerning tests/quality/stability. > > > > > > > >Cheers, > > > >Wilder > > > > > > > >* 2 LGTMs + tests (written/executed) > > > > > > > > > > > >> On 06 Nov 2015, at 10:49, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Well, IMHO the 2 issues are not big problems: > > > >> > > > >> 9015 - it sounds somewhat serious, I'll try to test these days what > > > >> happens if one of the VRs crashes, that's when we'd need redundancy > >> in > > > >> a more "real" scenario, if we could get this fixed before release > >> it'd > > > >> be ideal, Remi should know more re correct procedure here > > > >> > > > >> 9035 - sounds like a non-issue to me, if I want to reset the password and > >> the backup router does what it's told, then I don't care it doesn't have > >> the old passwords from the other router cached. This could impact instance > >> deployments or passwd resets right in the time BACKUP becomes MASTER. How > >> long is this generally? > > > >> > > > >> Lucian > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > >> > > > >> Nux! > > > >> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> > > > >> > > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > > >>> From: "Wilder Rodrigues" > >>> <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> > >>> > > > > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > > > >>> Sent: Friday, 6 November, 2015 09:29:56 > > > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > > > >> > > > >>> Thanks for the clear message, Lucian. I really appreciated that. :) > > > >>> > > > >>> It’s about the Redundant VPC, not the single one - which is working > > > >>> pretty fine, btw! > > > >>> > > > >>> Open issues are: > > > >>> > > > >>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9015 > > > >>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9035 > > > >>> > > > >>> And I have to write tests to cover Private Gateway and S2S VPN for > > > >>> Redundant VPC. > > > >>> > > > >>> All the rest working fine, as you have seen in my report. > > > >>> > > > >>> Cheers, > > > >>> Wilder > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On 06 Nov 2015, at 10:19, Nux! > >>> <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro%3cmailto:n...@li.nux.ro>>> > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Well, in my non-coder opinion, we should not deliver broken > >>> software, > > > >>> however we saw in the past fixing it all delayed release considerably. > > > >>> Now, how broken is that VPC? :) > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > >>> > > > >>> Nux! > > > >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro%3chttp:/www.nux.ro>> > > > >>> > > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > > > >>> From: "Wilder Rodrigues" > >>> <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> > >>> > > > > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > > > >>> Sent: Friday, 6 November, 2015 08:57:56 > > > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > > > >>> > > > >>> I forgot to mention that for the failed rVPC test I followed the > >>> same > > > >>> steps manually and it worked as expected. > > > >>> > > > >>> In addition, I would like to hear from the community what should we > > > >>> do in terms of minor/major bugs in new features (like the rVPC). > >>> Will > > > >>> those be fix and added to a 4.6.1 or should it still be part of 4.6.0? > > > >>> > > > >>> Cheers, > > > >>> Wilder > > > >>> > > > >>> On 06 Nov 2015, at 09:17, Wilder Rodrigues > > > >>> <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com%3cmailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>>> > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Hi all, > > > >>> > > > >>> My considerations after the tests agains XenServer 6.2: > > > >>> > > > >>> We got 4 failures whilst testing against Xen62: > > > >>> > > > >>> * test_vpc_redundant.py on line 522 > > > >>> - AssertionError: No Master or too many master routers found 0 > > > >>> * test_internal_lb.py lines 712 and 576, when trying to deploy a > > > >>> virtual machine > > > >>> - Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-36-89-VM] > > > >>> - Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-36-91-VM] > > > >>> * test_vpc_vpn.py line 604 for the same reason as above > > > >>> - Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-37-95-VM] > > > >>> > > > >>> There are bugs in the test_vpc_vpn.py VPN test: in case of failures, > > > >>> when we reach either line 604 or 624, it will try to assert the > >>> state > > > >>> of the variable vm1/vm2, but is has not been assigned yet, which > > > >>> makes us face an Unbound > > > >>> Error: > > > >>> - UnboundLocalError: local variable 'vm1' referenced before > > > >>> assignment > > > >>> > > > >>> Looking at the code I noticed that the same will happen for vm2, in > > > >>> case vm1 deployment passes but vm1 doesn’t. > > > >>> > > > >>> Concerning the LB and VPN tests, those failed due to a wrong > > > >>> template. Those tests should be executed against KVM only as they > > > >>> have a configuration which depends on KVM hypervisors > > > >>> > > > >>> ``` > > > >>> "default_hypervisor": "kvm", > > > >>> "compute_offering": { > > > >>> "name": "Tiny Instance", > > > >>> "displaytext": "Tiny Instance", > > > >>> "cpunumber": 1, > > > >>> "cpuspeed": 100, > > > >>> "memory": 128, > > > >>> } > > > >>> ``` > > > >>> > > > >>> But I will change that. > > > >>> > > > >>> Concerning the redundant VPC test that failed, it was due an absence > > > >>> of a master router. For some reason, after the > > > >>> self.delete_nat_rules() was called, the router switched from Master > > > >>> to Backup, which caused the error. I will investigate. > > > >>> > > > >>> There was also a problem reported by Boris concerning the DEB > > > >>> packages, which he already has a PR for ==> > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1040. This is package > > > >>> related, thus I don’t see it as a blocker for the release, hence my > > > >>> +1. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> ::: Full Report ::: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> :: Environment 1 :: > > > >>> > > > >>> * Hardware required: TRUE > > > >>> * Management Server + MySQL on CentOS 7.1 > > > >>> * Two XenServer 6.2 hosts > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> :: Tests Suites Executed :: > > > >>> > > > >>> nosetests --with-marvin > > > >>> --marvin-config=/data/shared/marvin/mct-zone1-xen1-ISOLATED.cfg -s > >>> -a > > > >>> tags=advanced,required_hardware=true component/test_vpc_redundant.py > > > >>> component/test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py > > > >>> component/test_routers_network_ops.py > > > >>> component/test_vpc_router_nics.py component/test_password_server.py > > > >>> component/test_router_dhcphosts.py > > > >>> smoke/test_loadbalance.py smoke/test_internal_lb.py > > > >>> smoke/test_ssvm.py smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py smoke/test_network.py > > > >>> > > > >>> :: Environment 2 :: > > > >>> > > > >>> * Hardware required: FALSE > > > >>> * Management Server + MySQL on CentOS 7.1 > > > >>> * Two XenServer 6.2 hosts > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> :: Tests Suites Executed :: > > > >>> > > > >>> nosetests --with-marvin > > > >>> --marvin-config=/data/shared/marvin/mct-zone1-xen1-ISOLATED.cfg -s > >>> -a > > > >>> tags=advanced,required_hardware=false smoke/test_routers.py > > > >>> smoke/test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py smoke/test_vm_life_cycle.py > > > >>> component/test_vpc_routers.py smoke/test_service_offerings.py > > > >>> component/test_vpc_offerings.py smoke/test_network_acl.py > > > >>> smoke/test_privategw_acl.py smoke/test_network.py > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> :: Summary :: > > > >>> > > > >>> * Tests executes: 75 > > > >>> * Successfull tests: 72 > > > >>> * Skipped tests: 6(*) > > > >>> * Failed tests: 5(**) > > > >>> > > > >>> (*) Tests were skipped because I had 2 hosts and the current logic > >>> in > > > >>> the tests does not cope with that: it lists the hosts and takes the > > > >>> one in index zero > > > >>> - host = hosts[0] > > > >>> (**) Failures and Exceptions being taken into counted > > > >>> > > > >>> :: Test results for Environment 1 :: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each > >>> network > > > >>> ... === > > > >>> TestName: test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Status : > > > >>> FAILED === > > > >>> FAIL > > > >>> Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each > >>> network > > > >>> and check default routes ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host > > > >>> credentials to check router services Test iptables default > > > >>> INPUT/FORWARD policy on RouterVM ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_02_routervm_iptables_policies | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > > > >>> iptables default INPUT/FORWARD policies on VPC router ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_01_single_VPC_iptables_policies | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > > > >>> redundant router internals ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === ok Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_02_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_false | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === ok Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === ok Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === ok Create a VPC with two networks with one VM in each > > > >>> network and test nics after destroy ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Status : SUCCESS === ok Create a > >>> VPC > > > >>> with two networks with one VM in each network and test default > >>> routes > > > >>> ... === TestName: test_02_VPC_default_routes | Status : SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok Check the password file in the Router VM ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_isolate_network_password_server | Status : SUCCESS === ok Check > > > >>> that the /etc/dhcphosts.txt doesn't contain duplicate IPs ... === > > > >>> TestName: test_router_dhcphosts | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to > > > >>> create Load balancing rule with source NAT ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_01_create_lb_rule_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to > > > >>> create Load balancing rule with non source NAT ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_02_create_lb_rule_non_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test for > > > >>> assign & removing load balancing rule ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_assign_and_removal_lb | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to verify > > > >>> access to loadbalancer haproxy admin stats page ... === TestName: > > > >>> test02_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | Status : > > > >>> EXCEPTION === ERROR Test create, assign, remove of an Internal LB > > > >>> with roundrobin http traffic to 3 vm's ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | Status : > > > >>> EXCEPTION === ERROR Test SSVM Internals ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_03_ssvm_internals | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test CPVM Internals > > > >>> ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host credentials to check > > > >>> router services Test stop SSVM ... === TestName: test_05_stop_ssvm | > > > >>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test stop CPVM ... SKIP: Marvin > >>> configuration > > > >>> has no host credentials to check router services Test reboot SSVM ... > > > >>> === TestName: test_07_reboot_ssvm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > > > >>> reboot CPVM ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host credentials > >>> to > > > >>> check router services Test destroy SSVM ... SKIP: Marvin > > > >>> configuration has no host credentials to check router services Test > > > >>> destroy CPVM ... === TestName: test_10_destroy_cpvm | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === ok Test Remote Access VPN in VPC ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Status : FAILED === FAIL Test VPN in > >>> VPC > > > >>> ... === TestName: test_vpc_site2site_vpn | Status : EXCEPTION === > > > >>> ERROR Test for port forwarding on source NAT ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_01_port_fwd_on_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test for port > > > >>> forwarding on non source NAT ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_02_port_fwd_on_non_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test for > > > >>> reboot router ... === TestName: test_reboot_router | Status : > >>> SUCCESS > > > >>> === ok Test for Router rules for network rules on acquired public IP > > > >>> ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_1_static_nat_rule | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === ok Test for Router rules for network rules on acquired > > > >>> public IP ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_2_nat_rule | Status : SUCCESS > > > >>> === ok Test for Router rules for network rules on acquired public IP > > > >>> ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_3_Load_Balancer_Rule | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === ok > > > >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> - > > > >>> - > > > >>> Ran 33 tests in 9352.773s > > > >>> > > > >>> FAILED (SKIP=5, errors=3, failures=2) > > > >>> (END) > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> :: Test results for Environment 2 :: > > > >>> > > > >>> Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin configuration > >>> has no host > > > >>> credentials to check router services > > > >>> Test restart network ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status > > > >>> : SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok > > > >>> Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok > > > >>> Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | > >>> Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok > > > >>> Test stop router ... === TestName: test_07_stop_router | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === ok Test start router ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test reboot router ... > > > >>> === TestName: test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > > > >>> reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test advanced > > > >>> zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | > > > >>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy > >>> Virtual > > > >>> Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS > > > >>> === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | > > > >>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual > > > >>> Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok > > > >>> Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status > >>> : > > > >>> SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok > > > >>> Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status > >>> : > > > >>> SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok > > > >>> Test migrate VM ... === TestName: test_08_migrate_vm | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === ok Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === > > > >>> TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > > > >>> start/stop of router after addition of one guest network ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_01_start_stop_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok > > > >>> Test reboot of router after addition of one guest network ... === > >>> TestName: > > > >>> test_02_reboot_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === ok Test to change service offering of router after > > > >>> addition of one guest network ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_04_chg_srv_off_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok > > > >>> Test destroy of router after addition of one guest network ... === > >>> TestName: > > > >>> test_05_destroy_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === ok Test to stop and start router after creation of VPC > > > >>> ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_01_stop_start_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok Test to reboot the router after creating a VPC ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_02_reboot_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === ok > > > >>> Tests to change service offering of the Router after ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_04_change_service_offerring_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > > > >>> to destroy the router after creating a VPC ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_05_destroy_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === ok > > > >>> Test to create service offering ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to > > > >>> update existing service offering ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to > > > >>> delete service offering ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > >>> create > > > >>> VPC offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_vpc_offering | Status > > > >>> : SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok > > > >>> Test VPC offering without load balancing service ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_03_vpc_off_without_lb | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPC > > > >>> offering without static NAT service ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_04_vpc_off_without_static_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > >>> VPC > > > >>> offering without port forwarding service ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_05_vpc_off_without_pf | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPC > > > >>> offering with invalid services ... === TestName: > > > >>> test_06_vpc_off_invalid_services | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > > > >>> update VPC offering ... === TestName: test_07_update_vpc_off | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok > > > >>> Test list VPC offering ... === TestName: test_08_list_vpc_off | > > > >>> Status : SUCCESS === ok test_09_create_redundant_vpc_offering > > > >>> (integration.component.test_vpc_offerings.TestVPCOffering) ... === > >>> TestName: > > > >>> test_09_create_redundant_vpc_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok > > > >>> test_privategw_acl (integration.smoke.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) > >>> ... > > > >>> === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test for > > > >>> delete account ... === TestName: test_delete_account | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === ok Test for Associate/Disassociate public IP address for > > > >>> admin account ... === > > > >>> TestName: test_public_ip_admin_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok > >>> Test > > > >>> for Associate/Disassociate public IP address for user account ... > >>> === > > > >>> TestName: test_public_ip_user_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test > > > >>> for release public IP address ... === TestName: test_releaseIP | Status : > > > >>> SUCCESS === > > > >>> ok > > > >>> > > > >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> - > > > >>> - > > > >>> Ran 42 tests in 5463.487s > > > >>> > > > >>> OK (SKIP=1) > > > >>> (END) > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On 05 Nov 2015, at 20:13, Nux! > >>> <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro%3cmailto:n...@li.nux.ro>>> > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Installation on CentOS 6 mgmt and HVs worked great, added some > > > >>> templates, deployed some instances, no issues. > > > >>> I'll get back if I hit problems. > > > >>> > > > >>> Lucian > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > >>> > > > >>> Nux! > > > >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro/<http://www.nux.ro%3chttp:/www.nux.ro/> > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > > > >>> From: "Nux!" > >>> <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro%3cmailto:nu > >>> x...@li.nux.ro>>> > > > >>> To: > >>> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:de > >>> v...@cloudstack.apache.org%3cmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> > > > >>> Sent: Thursday, 5 November, 2015 08:48:38 > > > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks Remi! > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > >>> > > > >>> Nux! > > > >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro%3chttp:/www.nux.ro>> > > > >>> > > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > > > >>> From: "Remi Bergsma" > > > >>> <rberg...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com<mail > >>> to:rberg...@schubergphilis.com%3cmailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com> > >>> >> > > > >>> To: > >>> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:de > >>> v...@cloudstack.apache.org%3cmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> > > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, 4 November, 2015 20:45:59 > > > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > > > >>> > > > >>> Kicked off some Jenkins builds: > > > >>> > > > >>> CentOS 6 packages: > > > >>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/cloudstack-rpm > >>> - > > > >>> packages-with-branch-parameter/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/rpm > >>> b > > > >>> uild/RPMS/x86_64/ > > > >>> > > > >>> CentOS 7 packages: > > > >>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/cloudstack-rpm > >>> - > > > >>> packages-with-branch-parameter-centos7/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/ > >>> d > > > >>> ist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ > > > >>> > > > >>> Ubuntu Trusty packages: > > > >>> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.6/pool/ > > > >>> > > > >>> SystemVM template: > > > >>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/parameterized- > >>> s > > > >>> ytemvm/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/ > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> You can always build packages from the source: > > > >>> cd packaging > > > >>> ./package.sh -h > > > >>> > > > >>> Happy testing! > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards, > > > >>> Remi > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On 04/11/15 18:12, "Remi Bergsma" > > > >>> <rberg...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com%3cmailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>>> > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> The jobs failed due to the git clone failing (time out). I also > > > >>> experience it is quite slow at the moment. > > > >>> > > > >>> It is mirrored here (same commit id): > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards, > > > >>> Remi > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On 04/11/15 17:17, "Rajani Karuturi" > > > >>> <rajani.karut...@citrix.com<mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com<mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com%3cmailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com>>> > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> I started jenkins builds for cloudstack RPM packages and systemvm > > > >>> templates for this branch here > > > >>> > > > >>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/cloudstack-rpm > >>> - > > > >>> packages-with-branch-parameter/19/console > > > >>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/parameterized- > >>> s > > > >>> ytemvm/3/console > > > >>> > > > >>> We can use them once the build is complete. > > > >>> > > > >>> ~Rajani > > > >>> > > > >>> On 04-Nov-2015, at 8:58 PM, Nux! > > > >>> <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro%3cmailto:n...@li.nux.ro>><mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> Has jenkins built rpms for this somewhere? > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > >>> > > > >>> Nux! > > > >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro><http://www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro%3c > >>> http:/www.nux.ro%3e%3chttp:/www.nux.ro>> > > > >>> > > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > > > >>> From: "Remi Bergsma" > > > >>> <rberg...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com<mail > >>> to:rberg...@schubergphilis.com%3cmailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com> > >>> >> > > > >>> To: > >>> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:de > >>> v...@cloudstack.apache.org%3cmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> > > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, 4 November, 2015 14:55:11 > > > >>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > > > >>> > > > >>> Hi all, > > > >>> > > > >>> I've created a 4.6.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts > > > >>> up for a > > > >>> vote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Git Branch and Commit SH: > > > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog; > >>> h > > > >>> =4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 > > > >>> > > > >>> Commit: b0ebe68e375432b28eef031ab62ccd5831234c77 > > > >>> > > > >>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > > > >>> location): > > > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.6.0/ > > > >>> > > > >>> PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F): > > > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > > >>> > > > >>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > >>> > > > >>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > > > >>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > > >>> > > > >>> [ ] +1 approve > > > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services > > IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> > CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> > CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> > CloudStack Software > Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/> > CloudStack Infrastructure > Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> > CloudStack Bootcamp Training > Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon > its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you > believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company > incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company > incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape > Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is > operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company > registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from > Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
