I havent used any of them. So, I could not recommend anyone. Building from source code [1] is the best way. As you would be in sync with community in terms of releases and issues. Taking a precompiled version doesnt guarantee if its the release that is voted by this community and makes it difficult to report an issue or get a fix for it from the community.
Thats my personal opinion and I understand that many prefer rpms/debs. [1] https://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html ~Rajani On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:46 PM, France <mailingli...@isg.si> wrote: > Tnx for response Rajani, it is greatly appreciated. > > You are correct, I do not know how i missed out, 4.3.2 in official repos. > Probably due to too much work. :-) > > However your response in regards of which to choose, does not really help > me. I have decided none the less, to use additionally patched build from > Shapeblue. > Unless someone warns me about potential problems with their patches, we > will stick to my decision for this weekends upgrade. > > Regards, > F. > > On 25 Jun 2015, at 06:01, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org> wrote: > > > you can use anything as long as it works for you. > > AFAIK, packages on apt-get.eu are created from the point where RC is > voted > > and they do have 4.3.2 in the link you mentioned above. > > > > ~Rajani > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:19 PM, France <mailingli...@isg.si> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> we will upgrade CS 4.3.1 (from http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/) > to > >> 4.3.2 this weekend. > >> > >> In official repos: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/ there is no > >> 4.3.2. > >> There is some build in Shapeblue’s repo: > >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/centos/4.3/ > >> and they also provide additionally pached build via: > >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/main/centos/4.3/ > >> > >> Is there any reason not to choose their patched version and change the > yum > >> repository? > >> > >> Tnx for info. > >> Regards, > >> F. > >> > >> > >
