Tnx for response Rajani, it is greatly appreciated. You are correct, I do not know how i missed out, 4.3.2 in official repos. Probably due to too much work. :-)
However your response in regards of which to choose, does not really help me. I have decided none the less, to use additionally patched build from Shapeblue. Unless someone warns me about potential problems with their patches, we will stick to my decision for this weekends upgrade. Regards, F. On 25 Jun 2015, at 06:01, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org> wrote: > you can use anything as long as it works for you. > AFAIK, packages on apt-get.eu are created from the point where RC is voted > and they do have 4.3.2 in the link you mentioned above. > > ~Rajani > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:19 PM, France <mailingli...@isg.si> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> we will upgrade CS 4.3.1 (from http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/) to >> 4.3.2 this weekend. >> >> In official repos: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/ there is no >> 4.3.2. >> There is some build in Shapeblue’s repo: >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/centos/4.3/ >> and they also provide additionally pached build via: >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/main/centos/4.3/ >> >> Is there any reason not to choose their patched version and change the yum >> repository? >> >> Tnx for info. >> Regards, >> F. >> >>
