For the time being, we are looking into OSS solutions for the storage, but will consider other stuff to.
Thx for sharing On 26 May 2015 at 15:24, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote: > If it's within your budget, we've had good results with NetApp and are > happy to recommend it. > I'm not responsible for configuring it, so I cannot say anything about how > we do that, but we're using it's clustering abilities and haven't had any > downtime on it. > > I believe the guys at Shuberg Philis also use NetApp(?) > > -- > Erik > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thx Erik, Interesting stuff :) > > > > We will test for now how Swift emulates S3 :) > > > > In general, we try to avoid single/multiply NFS boxes for SPOF and > scaling > > reasons, as Secondary Storage, so we are yet to come with good solution, > > that works in ACS in nice fashion... > > > > > > On 26 May 2015 at 15:13, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > These are probably a bit early to use anywhere production, but they do > > look > > > interesting: > > > https://github.com/bouncestorage/swiftproxy > > > https://github.com/bouncestorage/s3proxy > > > > > > -- > > > Erik > > > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > S3 seams the have different behavior, ex: download PCT status is > > > display. > > > > I haven't extensively test but seams to work well, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Andrija Panic < > > andrija.pa...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Guys, is using S3 for Secondary Storage any better supported in ACS > > in > > > > your > > > > > opinion? We plan to also try talking S3 to Swift, to see how that > > > > works... > > > > > > > > > > Thx > > > > > > > > > > On 26 May 2015 at 15:03, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion < > > pd...@cloudops.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Andrija, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swift integration in cloudstack + XenServer require interaction > > > from > > > > > > > Xenserver to initiate connection to Swift proxies, this is > made > > > > using > > > > > > > /etc/xapi.d/plugins/swiftxen which is a fairly old python > script > > > that > > > > > > only > > > > > > > support Swift api V1. I've tried to upgrade that script which > > > seams > > > > to > > > > > > be > > > > > > > a generic one from OpenStack, but the Python version running on > > > > > XenServer > > > > > > > Dom0 (XS 6.2) is too old to make the new script work :-S. > Maybe > > it > > > > > would > > > > > > > on XS 6.5 ? I don't know if this would be easily fixed on KVM. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XS 6.5 is still running CentOS 5 in Dom0, so I doubt it. > > > > > > Wait for the next release which is said to be based on CentOS 7. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Erik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Andrija Panić > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Andrija Panić > > > -- Andrija Panić
