Thx Erik, Interesting stuff :)

We will test for now how Swift emulates S3 :)

In general, we try to avoid single/multiply NFS boxes for SPOF and scaling
reasons, as Secondary Storage, so we are yet to come with good solution,
that works in ACS in nice fashion...


On 26 May 2015 at 15:13, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> These are probably a bit early to use anywhere production, but they do look
> interesting:
> https://github.com/bouncestorage/swiftproxy
> https://github.com/bouncestorage/s3proxy
>
> --
> Erik
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com>
> wrote:
>
> > S3 seams the have different behavior, ex:  download PCT status is
> display.
> > I haven't extensively test but seams to work well,
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Guys, is using S3 for Secondary Storage any better supported in ACS in
> > your
> > > opinion? We plan to also try talking S3 to Swift, to see how that
> > works...
> > >
> > > Thx
> > >
> > > On 26 May 2015 at 15:03, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Andrija,
> > > > >
> > > > > Swift integration in cloudstack + XenServer require interaction
> from
> > > > > Xenserver to initiate connection to Swift proxies,  this is made
> > using
> > > > > /etc/xapi.d/plugins/swiftxen which is a fairly old python script
> that
> > > > only
> > > > > support Swift api V1.  I've tried to upgrade that script which
> seams
> > to
> > > > be
> > > > > a generic one from OpenStack, but the Python version running on
> > > XenServer
> > > > > Dom0 (XS 6.2) is too old to make the new script work :-S.  Maybe it
> > > would
> > > > > on XS 6.5 ?  I don't know if this would be easily fixed on KVM.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > XS 6.5 is still running CentOS 5 in Dom0, so I doubt it.
> > > > Wait for the next release which is said to be based on CentOS 7.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Erik
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Andrija Panić
> > >
> >
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

Reply via email to