-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23737/#review79039
-----------------------------------------------------------


Thank you for submitting your CloudStack contribution through review board. 
After discussion on the dev@cloudstack.apache.org the community decided to 
close down review board and start accepting contributiong through GitHub pull 
requests. We have been using GH PR for several months now and the process is 
better than review board.

We will keep Review Board open for another week to give you time to migrate 
your patch to a github PR if you wish. After that time, your patch will no 
longer be viewable (even though it will not be deleted).

Please consider submitting a pull request.

Great instructions are available at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md

Thank you very much for your time and your contribution to Apache CloudStack, 
we hope that using this new process will encourage you to do more.

- Sebastien Goasguen


On July 21, 2014, 1:42 p.m., Miguel Ferreira wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/23737/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 21, 2014, 1:42 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland, Hugo Trippaers, and Wei Zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added step-wise log messages during deploy data center.
> 
> Also reordered some parameters in the advanced zone config for better 
> readability.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg 74b6366 
>   tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py ae48839 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23737/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Used deployDataCenter.py together with advanced zone config to deploy a zone 
> in my development environment
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Miguel Ferreira
> 
>

Reply via email to