Fellow debs,

Sonali reported a bug on users@ and I checked the code as checked in
for CLOUDSTACK-1966. It is not applicable anymore. I think this peace
of code has be fixed on several release branches by different people.
The code in master contains a line from 2010 that is not in 4.4.
Anyone has an expert opinion on how this accounting issue should be
implemented?

thanks,

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Sonali Jadhav
<son...@servercentralen.se> wrote:
> Hi Prashant,
>
> I have reported both bugs
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8283
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8284
>
> But I observed that my bug id 8283, has already been reported in april-2013  
> for 4.2.0 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1966 ,and issue is 
> closed.
>
> And I am running 4.4.2, but I am still getting same issue.
>
> /Sonali
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 4:21 PM
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Primary storage limit issue
>
>
>
> On 2/20/15, 10:46 AM, "Sonali Jadhav" <son...@servercentralen.se> wrote:
>
>>Anyone  help?
>>
>>/Sonali
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Sonali Jadhav [mailto:son...@servercentralen.se]
>>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:34 AM
>>To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: Primary storage limit issue
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Yes, in resource_count table, I found this ,
>>
>>mysql> select * from resource_count where domain_id=3;
>>+-----+------------+-----------+-------------------+-------------+
>>| id  | account_id | domain_id | type              | count       |
>>+-----+------------+-----------+-------------------+-------------+
>>| 113 |       NULL |         3 | user_vm           |           0 |
>>| 114 |       NULL |         3 | public_ip         |           0 |
>>| 115 |       NULL |         3 | volume            |           0 |
>>| 116 |       NULL |         3 | snapshot          |           0 |
>>| 117 |       NULL |         3 | template          |           0 |
>>| 118 |       NULL |         3 | project           |           0 |
>>| 119 |       NULL |         3 | network           |           0 |
>>| 120 |       NULL |         3 | vpc               |           0 |
>>| 121 |       NULL |         3 | cpu               |           0 |
>>| 122 |       NULL |         3 | memory            |           0 |
>>| 123 |       NULL |         3 | primary_storage   | 65498251264 |
>>| 124 |       NULL |         3 | secondary_storage |           0 |
>>+-----+------------+-----------+-------------------+-------------+
>>
>>So then I logged into same domain from UI, and in "Domains" section
>>clicked on "update resource count". After which in resource_count table
>>"primary_storage" table value went back to zero. Is this a bug ?
>>Because such way every time domain admin has to update resource count
>>to do actual reset.
>
>>>There should be a bug on this (check jira):After  release of resource
>>>resource_count table should be updated accordingly
>>
>>2nd Bug, I have observed, I had set primary storage limit on domain to
>>40GB, On account there is no limit defined. From domain admin login
>>when I try to create first instance, I can add disk of any size, e.g. I
>>gave 200GB disk and it created instance without any error. But when I
>>try to add more disk or new instance with nay disk size it gives error,
>>that resource limit is exceeded.
>>
>>So how come domain admin can create 200GB primary storage instance when
>>limit is set to 40GB ?
>
>>>>Again it is an issue please open a ticket.
>>In what priorities resource count limits are  considered by cloudstack ?
>>I thought it was  1. global settings,  2. Domain,  3.  Account,  4.
>>Project
>>
>>
>>/Sonali
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com]
>>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:15 AM
>>To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: Primary storage limit issue
>>
>>Since volumes are expunged , Only possibility  is resource_count table
>>, please update the primary storage count to zero (seems a bug to me).
>>
>>On 2/18/15, 8:08 PM, "Somesh Naidu" <somesh.na...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Have you looked at the resource_count table?
>>>
>>>Can you try updating resource count (UI/API) to see if that fixes the
>>>issue.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Somesh
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Sonali Jadhav [mailto:son...@servercentralen.se]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 8:05 AM
>>>To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>Subject: RE: Primary storage limit issue
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Yes capacity checker is running.
>>>
>>>mysql> select
>>>domain_id,name,recreatable,created,attached,updated,removed,state from
>>>volumes;
>>>+-----------+-----------------------+-------------+---------------------+
>>>-
>>>---------+---------------------+---------------------+----------+
>>>| domain_id | name                  | recreatable | created             |
>>>attached | updated             | removed             | state    | Size |
>>>+-----------+-----------------------+-------------+---------------------+
>>>-
>>>---------+---------------------+---------------------+----------+
>>>|         3 | ROOT-16               |           0 | 2015-02-18 08:29:34 |
>>>NULL     | 2015-02-18 08:42:40 | 2015-02-18 08:42:40 | Expunged |
>>>21474836480 |
>>>|         3 | ROOT-17               |           1 | 2015-02-18 08:28:18 |
>>>NULL     | 2015-02-18 13:00:07 | 2015-02-18 13:00:07 | Expunged |
>>>2621440000 |
>>>|         3 | ROOT-18               |           0 | 2015-02-18 08:56:07 |
>>>NULL     | 2015-02-18 09:07:25 | 2015-02-18 09:07:25 | Expunged |
>>>44023414784 |
>>>
>>>
>>>Above are the only 3 values I could find in volumes tables for domain
>>>id 3.
>>>And still I am getting error that " Maximum number of resources of
>>>type 'primary_storage' for domain id=3 has been exceeded"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>/Sonali
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 5:43 PM
>>>To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>Subject: Re: Primary storage limit issue
>>>
>>>1-Capacity checkers is  running  ( can be found in global settings)  ?
>>>
>>>2- Check volumes  table if there are some volume in which are not
>>>destroyed .
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>prashant
>>>
>>>From: Sonali Jadhav
>>><son...@servercentralen.se<mailto:son...@servercentralen.se>>
>>>Reply-To:
>>>"us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>"
>>><us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
>>>Date: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 at 3:17 PM
>>>To: "us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>"
>>><us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
>>>Subject: Primary storage limit issue
>>>
>>>Forgot attachment, sending mail again. :)
>>>
>>>/Sonali
>>>
>>>From: Sonali Jadhav
>>>Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 3:15 PM
>>>To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>>>Subject: Primary storage limit issue
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I have strange issue with resource limits set on sub-domain.
>>>I was doing some tests for checking resource limitation behavior on
>>>sub-domain, a/c and project.
>>>
>>>For account , I didn't set any limits. Instead I set limits on
>>>sub-domain. But this specific Primary storage limit(40GB) acted weird.
>>>At first in sub-domain, I created new instance (without project), and
>>>assigned 41 GB, and it successfully created VM. Then I deleted that VM
>>>with Expunge option enabled, and tried to create vm again with disk
>>>size 42, which failed with error "Maximum number of resources of type
>>>'primary_storage' for domain id=3 has been exceeded"
>>>Then I gave disk size to 39GB, that also failed with same error. And
>>>now if I create any disk size its failing. There are no instances or
>>>volumes under that sub-domain.
>>>What could be the problem ?
>>>
>>>Have a look at attached log file.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>/Sonali
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Daan

Reply via email to