-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25647/#review53488
-----------------------------------------------------------



engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/CloudOrchestrator.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25647/#comment93132>

    yes mike, when you create a compute offering with  a specified min and max 
iops on contrary to the custom iops, iops was setting null for the root disk, 
since a new rootdiskoffering object is being created, predefined iops were not 
being set.
    
    and yes, this issue is not related to this S3 bug, but i thought it to be a 
minor one, so i clubbed it with this review.


- punith s


On Sept. 15, 2014, 7:41 p.m., punith s wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/25647/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 15, 2014, 7:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, amit kumar das and Mike Tutkowski.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 7406
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/7406
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> since cloudstack is not able to process the S3 or Switf templates for its 
> virtual size(root disk size), admin is facing issues while creating a vm 
> using third party storage plugins like cloudbyte and solidfire etc.
> this patch enables the resize of root disk, on passing a  variable 
> ismanagedstorage = true in deployVmCmd as a detail.
> hence template root disksize is overriden by the given rootdisk size by the 
> admin
> 
> this patch also fixes the iops null issue.
> 
> for more ref
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7406
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/CloudOrchestrator.java
>  2b49954 
>   server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java 0ea2a89 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25647/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> dry run only.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> punith s
> 
>

Reply via email to