+1 (binding)
Tested RHEL 6.3 MS with XS 6.2 (fresh install). Followed test procedure 
(s/4.3.0/4.3.1) to verify bits and hash. 

--
Chiradeep

> On Sep 11, 2014, at 1:02 PM, "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:56 PM, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Sorry I just notice Rohit made a systemvm template change (commit
>> 3a0f1550289a8a2a50b0f786821cec2e5c914e62) on 9th, September.
>> The systemvm template will be built based on debian 7.5.0 instead of 7.4.0
> 
> Wei, can you test and vote ? that would be great
> 
>> 
>> 
>> ==========
>> 
>> commit 3a0f1550289a8a2a50b0f786821cec2e5c914e62
>> Author: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
>> Date:   Tue Sep 9 18:37:15 2014 +0200
>> 
>>   appliance: fix newer debian iso links and checksums for debian
>> 
>>   Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
>>   (cherry picked from commit ac5309b8b47ddb1e5588a2d5090f2bcce0e7c2a4)
>> 
>>   Conflicts:
>>       tools/appliance/definitions/systemvm64template/definition.rb
>>       tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb
>> 
>> diff --git a/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvm64template/definition.rb
>> b/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvm64template/definition.rb
>> index f9308a0..bd59025 100644
>> --- a/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvm64template/definition.rb
>> +++ b/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvm64template/definition.rb
>> @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ Veewee::Definition.declare({
>>  :memory_size=> '256',
>>  :disk_size => '2500', :disk_format => 'VDI', :hostiocache => 'off',
>>  :os_type_id => 'Debian_64',
>> -  :iso_file => "debian-7.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso",
>> -  :iso_src => "
>> http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.4.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-7.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso
>> ",
>> -  :iso_md5 => "e7e9433973f082a297793c3c5010b2c5",
>> +  :iso_file => "debian-7.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso",
>> +  :iso_src => "
>> http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.5.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-7.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso
>> ",
>> +  :iso_md5 => "8fdb6715228ea90faba58cb84644d296",
>>  :iso_download_timeout => "1000",
>>  :boot_wait => "10", :boot_cmd_sequence => [
>>     '<Esc>',
>> diff --git a/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb
>> b/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb
>> index fcaab4d..9b57379 100644
>> --- a/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb
>> +++ b/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb
>> @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ Veewee::Definition.declare({
>>  :memory_size=> '256',
>>  :disk_size => '2500', :disk_format => 'VDI', :hostiocache => 'off',
>>  :os_type_id => 'Debian',
>> -  :iso_file => "debian-7.4.0-i386-netinst.iso",
>> -  :iso_src => "
>> http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.4.0/i386/iso-cd/debian-7.4.0-i386-netinst.iso
>> ",
>> -  :iso_md5 => "7339b668a81b417ac023d73739dc6a03",
>> +  :iso_file => "debian-7.5.0-i386-netinst.iso",
>> +  :iso_src => "
>> http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.5.0/i386/iso-cd/debian-7.5.0-i386-netinst.iso
>> ",
>> +  :iso_md5 => "0e6eaacb5a5828473afe90f6df9c8f16",
>>  :iso_download_timeout => "1000",
>>  :boot_wait => "10", :boot_cmd_sequence => [
>>     '<Esc>',
>> 
>> 
>> 2014-09-11 21:50 GMT+02:00 Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> OK, I looked into this more.
>>>> 
>>>> It turns out the regression test that was failing is only valid in 4.4
>>> and
>>>> beyond, so it is not a valid test for 4.3.
>>> 
>>> so can you vote ? we need your binding vote :)
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I have an integration test failing when trying to create a (XenServer)
>>>>> storage repository.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Let me look into it for an hour or so and then I can respond back as to
>>> if
>>>>> it's a code issue.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm thinking now it's a problem with XAPI. At first the code wasn't
>>>>> compiling due to XAPI changes and now I'm getting this XAPI issue when
>>>>> trying to create a storage repository. Seems possibly related.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Except heartbleed fix.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I was merely checking if it's even poosible to do an automated upgrade.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The way i know the upgrade process we add some sql magic to check for
>>> new
>>>>>> systemvm templates. If that's not made for 4.3.1 it won't do much good
>>> to
>>>>>> add it as systemvm-hypervisor-version.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Erik
>>>>>> 11. sep. 2014 15:45 skrev "Wei ZHOU" <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> følgende:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> As far as I know, there is no systemvm change during upgrade from
>>> 4.3.0
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> 4.3.1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 2014-09-11 15:22 GMT+02:00 Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I've upgraded and it looks ok for now.
>>>>>>>>> I have used these system VMs
>>>>>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm/
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> added them as systemvm-kvm-4.3 in the Templates.
>>>>>>>>> I expected them to replace SystemVM Template (KVM), but they are
>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>> listed as systemvm-kvm-4.3 alongside the old ones.
>>>>>>>>> Other than that everything seems ok for now.
>>>>>>>> Is there an upgrade path from 4.3.0 systemvm template to 4.3.1? Log
>>> on
>>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>>> newly deployed one and check /etc/cloudstack-version
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Erik
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>>>>> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>>>> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
> 

Reply via email to