On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:56 PM, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry I just notice Rohit made a systemvm template change (commit
> 3a0f1550289a8a2a50b0f786821cec2e5c914e62) on 9th, September.
> The systemvm template will be built based on debian 7.5.0 instead of 7.4.0
> 

Wei, can you test and vote ? that would be great

> 
> 
> ==========
> 
> commit 3a0f1550289a8a2a50b0f786821cec2e5c914e62
> Author: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> Date:   Tue Sep 9 18:37:15 2014 +0200
> 
>    appliance: fix newer debian iso links and checksums for debian
> 
>    Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
>    (cherry picked from commit ac5309b8b47ddb1e5588a2d5090f2bcce0e7c2a4)
> 
>    Conflicts:
>        tools/appliance/definitions/systemvm64template/definition.rb
>        tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb
> 
> diff --git a/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvm64template/definition.rb
> b/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvm64template/definition.rb
> index f9308a0..bd59025 100644
> --- a/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvm64template/definition.rb
> +++ b/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvm64template/definition.rb
> @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ Veewee::Definition.declare({
>   :memory_size=> '256',
>   :disk_size => '2500', :disk_format => 'VDI', :hostiocache => 'off',
>   :os_type_id => 'Debian_64',
> -  :iso_file => "debian-7.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso",
> -  :iso_src => "
> http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.4.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-7.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso
> ",
> -  :iso_md5 => "e7e9433973f082a297793c3c5010b2c5",
> +  :iso_file => "debian-7.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso",
> +  :iso_src => "
> http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.5.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-7.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso
> ",
> +  :iso_md5 => "8fdb6715228ea90faba58cb84644d296",
>   :iso_download_timeout => "1000",
>   :boot_wait => "10", :boot_cmd_sequence => [
>      '<Esc>',
> diff --git a/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb
> b/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb
> index fcaab4d..9b57379 100644
> --- a/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb
> +++ b/tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb
> @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ Veewee::Definition.declare({
>   :memory_size=> '256',
>   :disk_size => '2500', :disk_format => 'VDI', :hostiocache => 'off',
>   :os_type_id => 'Debian',
> -  :iso_file => "debian-7.4.0-i386-netinst.iso",
> -  :iso_src => "
> http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.4.0/i386/iso-cd/debian-7.4.0-i386-netinst.iso
> ",
> -  :iso_md5 => "7339b668a81b417ac023d73739dc6a03",
> +  :iso_file => "debian-7.5.0-i386-netinst.iso",
> +  :iso_src => "
> http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.5.0/i386/iso-cd/debian-7.5.0-i386-netinst.iso
> ",
> +  :iso_md5 => "0e6eaacb5a5828473afe90f6df9c8f16",
>   :iso_download_timeout => "1000",
>   :boot_wait => "10", :boot_cmd_sequence => [
>      '<Esc>',
> 
> 
> 2014-09-11 21:50 GMT+02:00 Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com>:
> 
>> 
>> On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> OK, I looked into this more.
>>> 
>>> It turns out the regression test that was failing is only valid in 4.4
>> and
>>> beyond, so it is not a valid test for 4.3.
>>> 
>> 
>> so can you vote ? we need your binding vote :)
>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I have an integration test failing when trying to create a (XenServer)
>>>> storage repository.
>>>> 
>>>> Let me look into it for an hour or so and then I can respond back as to
>> if
>>>> it's a code issue.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm thinking now it's a problem with XAPI. At first the code wasn't
>>>> compiling due to XAPI changes and now I'm getting this XAPI issue when
>>>> trying to create a storage repository. Seems possibly related.
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Except heartbleed fix.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was merely checking if it's even poosible to do an automated upgrade.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The way i know the upgrade process we add some sql magic to check for
>> new
>>>>> systemvm templates. If that's not made for 4.3.1 it won't do much good
>> to
>>>>> add it as systemvm-hypervisor-version.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Erik
>>>>> 11. sep. 2014 15:45 skrev "Wei ZHOU" <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> følgende:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> As far as I know, there is no systemvm change during upgrade from
>> 4.3.0
>>>>> to
>>>>>> 4.3.1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2014-09-11 15:22 GMT+02:00 Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I've upgraded and it looks ok for now.
>>>>>>>> I have used these system VMs
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm/
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> added them as systemvm-kvm-4.3 in the Templates.
>>>>>>>> I expected them to replace SystemVM Template (KVM), but they are
>>>>> still
>>>>>>>> listed as systemvm-kvm-4.3 alongside the old ones.
>>>>>>>> Other than that everything seems ok for now.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is there an upgrade path from 4.3.0 systemvm template to 4.3.1? Log
>> on
>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>> newly deployed one and check /etc/cloudstack-version
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Erik
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>>>> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>>> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to