Actually, if you're in the position to play a bit... New deployments seem
to work, and I believe it's because that broadcastUri is stored in the db
in the new format:
mysql> select id,vlan_id from vlan where network_id = (select id from
networks where traffic_type="Public");
+----+-----------------+
| id | vlan_id |
+----+-----------------+
| 1 | vlan://untagged |
+----+-----------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
I believe 4.2 and earlier would say just 'untagged' there. If you want to
attempt changing that value to include vlan:// (if it is in fact missing),
then restarting everything, that may fix the issue.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I thinnk the commit that caused the change was this or related to it. Is
> there any way you could test a fix? Do you need me to build 4.3 RPMs or can
> I just provide a patch? What works for you?
>
> commit 53d09c6f1843f04c5f1ab76be9419f5584302d1e
> Date: Mon Aug 5 11:52:40 2013 +0200
>
> uri code per broadcast/isolation type , default is to accept anything
> as uri , vlan and lswitch need some extra tlc
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Note the differences in broadcastUri, here is your plug command:
>>
>> {
>> "com.cloud.agent.api.PlugNicCommand": {
>> "nic": {
>> "deviceId": 1,
>> "networkRateMbps": 99999,
>> "defaultNic": true,
>> "uuid": "6c782af3-2071-4543-acdc-cb30096e89ff",
>> "ip": "46.232.xxx.246",
>> "netmask": "255.255.255.0",
>> "gateway": "46.232.xxx.1",
>> "mac": "06:53:82:00:00:25",
>> "broadcastType": "Vlan",
>> "type": "Public",
>> "broadcastUri": "vlan://untagged",
>> "isolationUri": "vlan://untagged",
>> "isSecurityGroupEnabled": false,
>> "name": "breth1-500"
>> },
>> "instanceName": "r-801-VM",
>> "vmType": "DomainRouter",
>> "wait": 0
>> }
>> }
>>
>> and here is your ip associate command:
>>
>> {
>> "com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand": {
>> "ipAddresses": [
>> {
>> "accountId": 11,
>> "publicIp": "46.232.xxx.246",
>> "sourceNat": true,
>> "add": true,
>> "oneToOneNat": false,
>> "firstIP": false,
>> "broadcastUri": "untagged",
>> "vlanGateway": "46.232.xxx.1",
>> "vlanNetmask": "255.255.255.0",
>> "vifMacAddress": "06:53:82:00:00:25",
>> "networkRate": 99999,
>> "trafficType": "Public",
>> "networkName": "breth1-500"
>> }
>> ],
>> "accessDetails": {
>> "router.guest.ip": "46.232.xxx.246",
>> "zone.network.type": "Advanced",
>> "router.name": "r-801-VM",
>> "router.ip": "169.254.0.52"
>> },
>> "wait": 0
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> yes, correct, eth1 is present, and can be started by static IP
>>> configuration...
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30 May 2014 17:25, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Let me make sure I understand... the 'Plug' of the nic works fine, as
>>> it
>>> > seems you do have an eth1 and can manually assign the IP to get it to
>>> work?
>>> > If that's the case then there's probably not an issue in
>>> BridgeVifDriver or
>>> > the XML. It is definitely in fetching/matching the eth device here
>>> >
>>> > vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52 -A -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c ethnull -g
>>> > 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Andrija Panic <
>>> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Nope, started, did check, it is reported now as Debian 5 VM, but
>>> still
>>> > > doesn't work...
>>> > > Rebooted VPC (destroyed VR, new one created...)
>>> > >
>>> > > $ virsh dumpxml r-812-VM
>>> > > ...
>>> > > <description>Debian GNU/Linux 5(64-bit)</description>
>>> > > ...
>>> > > <os>
>>> > > <type arch='x86_64' machine='rhel6.5.0'>hvm</type>
>>> > > <boot dev='cdrom'/>
>>> > > <boot dev='hd'/>
>>> > > </os>
>>> > >
>>> > > :(
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On 30 May 2014 16:24, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > I confirm, the highest is Debian 5 64bit
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Per docs
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.3/rnotes.html#upgrade-from-4-2-x-to-4-3
>>> > > > , you should use Debian 7.0 64bit as OS type for system-kvm-4.3
>>> > > template...
>>> > > > (same for xen and vmware templatest)
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Will change now DB to point to debian 5, and let you know.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > This is guest_os_id: 184 | 2 | NULL |
>>> > > > 986a0e98-39d6-11e3-8f93-0025904e4412 | Debian GNU/Linux 7(64-bit)
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On 30 May 2014 15:45, Joris van Lieshout <
>>> > > jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> Andrija,
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> The thing is I don't know who the os matching on KVM works. There
>>> must
>>> > > be
>>> > > >> a way to list supported os types.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> I also did some queuing on the guest_os_hypervisor table (ACS 4.3)
>>> > and I
>>> > > >> don't see Debian 7 for KVM listed.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> select * from guest_os join guest_os_hypervisor on
>>> > > >> guest_os.id=guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_id where
>>> > > >> guest_os_hypervisor.hypervisor_type='KVM' and
>>> > > >> guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_name like '%Debian%';
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> What was the guest_os_id you where using? Could you try id 72
>>> (Debian
>>> > 5
>>> > > >> 64-bit)? Adjust both os_type_id in vm_instance and vm_template
>>> (where
>>> > > >> type='SYSTEM' and hypervisor_type='KVM').
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Kind regards,
>>> > > >> Joris van Lieshout
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Schuberg Philis
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On 30/05/14 15:33, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> >Joris,
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> >do you have recommendation on how in particular to try ? I'm not
>>> sure
>>> > > how
>>> > > >> >to fix that, except playing with editing systemvm-4.3 template to
>>> > > define
>>> > > >> >it
>>> > > >> >as another OS type... ?
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> >Thanks again,
>>> > > >> >Andrija
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> >On 30 May 2014 15:30, Joris van Lieshout <
>>> > > >> jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
>>> > > >> >wrote:
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> >> I've read back a bit in the code and if you look at
>>> > > >> BridgeVifDriver.java
>>> > > >> >> (this is where the log message with the nic profile is
>>> generated)
>>> > you
>>> > > >> >>can
>>> > > >> >> see that the nic information might be off already once ACS
>>> hits the
>>> > > >> >> LibvirtVMDef.InterfaceDef plug function. This leads be to
>>> believer
>>> > > that
>>> > > >> >> the HVM/PV OS mismatch issue might still be related. Try fixing
>>> > that
>>> > > >> >> first. At least it will allow us to exclude this from the list.
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >> Kind regards,
>>> > > >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >> Schuberg Philis
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >> On 30/05/14 15:26, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >OK, thanks Joris.
>>> > > >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >I will try playing with OS version option, on the
>>> systemvm-kvm-4.3
>>> > > >> >> >template...
>>> > > >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >Let me know if I can help with anything more.
>>> > > >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >Thanks.
>>> > > >> >> >Andrija
>>> > > >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >On 30 May 2014 15:19, Joris van Lieshout
>>> > > >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>>> > > >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> That does sound familiar and in the start xml of KVM you
>>> can see
>>> > > >> >>"<type
>>> > > >> >> >> arch='x86_64' machine='pc'>hvm</type>". I don't know KVM+ACS
>>> > well
>>> > > >> >>enough
>>> > > >> >> >> to judge if this is the cause but I thing focusing on
>>> getting
>>> > the
>>> > > VR
>>> > > >> >> >> started as PV guest might be worth trying. On the other
>>> hand I
>>> > do
>>> > > >> see
>>> > > >> >> >> patchviasocket.pl being executed successfully...
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> The other thing I see is, and now we're getting into java
>>> code,
>>> > is
>>> > > >> >>this:
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,386{GMT} DEBUG
>>> > [kvm.resource.BridgeVifDriver]
>>> > > >> >> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:)
>>> > > >> >> >>nic=[Nic:Public-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged]
>>> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,502{GMT} DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
>>> > > >> >> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:) Processing command:
>>> > > >> >> >> com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand
>>> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,506{GMT} DEBUG
>>> > > >> >> >> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
>>> > > >> >> >>(agentRequest-Handler-3:)
>>> > > >> >> >> Executing:
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh
>>> > > >> >> >> vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52 -A -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c
>>> ethnull -g
>>> > > >> >> >> 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> My suspicion is that somewhere in the translation from the
>>> nic
>>> > > >> >>profile
>>> > > >> >> >>to
>>> > > >> >> >> the actual route_proxy.sh command ACS failes to find the
>>> nic id
>>> > > and
>>> > > >> >> >> returns null.
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> Let me dig a bit deeper and see what I can find but this is
>>> > where
>>> > > we
>>> > > >> >> >>might
>>> > > >> >> >> need some help from someone with knowledge of this pice of
>>> the
>>> > > code.
>>> > > >> >>:)
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> Kind regards,
>>> > > >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>>> > > >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
>>> > > >> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
>>> > > >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
>>> > > >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:49, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >I have turned on DEBUG loging in agent.log on cs1.xxx/net
>>> host:
>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >So, management logs again: http://pastebin.com/F6BRf7Y9
>>> > > >> >> >> >Agent logs on cs1.xxx: http://pastebin.com/BJauKbaC
>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >Not playing smart, but there is some error:
>>> > > >> >> >> >[kvm.resource.KVMGuestOsMapper]
>>> > > >> >> >> >(agentRequest-Handler-3:) Can't find the mapping of guest
>>> os:
>>> > > >> Debian
>>> > > >> >> >> >GNU/Linux 7(64-bit)
>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >Best,
>>> > > >> >> >> >Andrija
>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 14:26, Joris van Lieshout
>>> > > >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> Bold formatting does not come trough on the dev list. :)
>>> > > >> >> >> >> But u might need a bit more info.
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> At a certain point I see this line
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> 2014-05-30 13:56:23,935 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>>> > > >> >> >> >> (Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
>>> 1-609104082:
>>> > > >> >>Sending
>>> > > >> >> >> {
>>> > > >> >> >> >> Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 1(cs1.xxxxx.net), Ver:
>>> v1,
>>> > > >> Flags:
>>> > > >> >> >> >>100111,
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":801,"name":"r-801-VM
>>> > > >> >>>>>>".
>>> > > >> >> >>>>..
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> This is where the information is passed on to the agent
>>> > > handles.
>>> > > >> >>For
>>> > > >> >> >>XS
>>> > > >> >> >> >> this would initiate an agent handler on the management
>>> server
>>> > > but
>>> > > >> >>for
>>> > > >> >> >> >>KVM,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> if I remember correctly, it passed the command on to the
>>> > > >> >>cloudstack
>>> > > >> >> >> >>agent
>>> > > >> >> >> >> service on the hypervisor.
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> Can you check the cloud service log on the KVM hypervisor
>>> > > >> >>executing
>>> > > >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> request? it's this server cs1.xxxxx.net and then search
>>> top
>>> > > down
>>> > > >> >>for
>>> > > >> >> >> >> 609104082 in the log. See if you can provide the log
>>> from the
>>> > > >> >>agent
>>> > > >> >> >> >> handler thread started by that sequence.
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>>> > > >> >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
>>> > > >> >> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
>>> > > >> >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
>>> > > >> >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:08, "Andrija Panic" <
>>> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> >>wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >here is the management log:
>>> http://pastebin.com/zxnKxFhk
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Interesting parts (to me): in bold
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,899 DEBUG
>>> > > >> >>[o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) copyAsync
>>> > > inspecting
>>> > > >> >>src
>>> > > >> >> >> >>type
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >TEMPLATE copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,905 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
>>> > 4-1248669612:
>>> > > >> >> >>Sending
>>> > > >> >> >> >>{
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4(cs2.xxxxx.net),
>>> Ver: v1,
>>> > > >> >>Flags:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> 100011,
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>.a
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>pa
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>ch
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>e.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>f-
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>b0
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>b4
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >-5e351e7cae55","origUrl":"
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-mas
>>> > > >> >> >> >>t
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >er-kvm.qcow2.bz2
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>","uuid":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0f-b0b4-5e351e7cae55","id":414,"format":"Q
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>CO
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>W2
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>",
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > >"accountId":2,"checksum":"85a1bed07bf43cbf022451cb2ecae4ff","
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >*hvm":true*
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>,"displayText":"systemvm-kvm-4.3","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.clou
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>ds
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>ta
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>ck
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b93422e-1a66-353d-88a8-220
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>3f
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>79
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>b1
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net
>>> > > >> ","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
>>> > > >> >> >> >>8
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >a8-2203f79b1dc6
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>"}},"name":"414-2-ec331e74-5858-3153-91a9-1d706d9c533e","hypervisorT
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>yp
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>e"
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>:"
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>KVM"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>"u
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>ui
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>d"
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>:"9c440d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","volumeType":"ROOT","dataSto
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>re
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>":
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>{"
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b9342
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>2e
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>-1
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>a6
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> >6-353d-88a8-2203f79b1dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net
>>> > > >> ","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
>>> > > >> >> >> >>8
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>a8-2203f79b1dc6"}},"name":"ROOT-801","size":2621440000,"volumeId":10
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>64
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>,"
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>vm
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>Name":"r-801-VM","accountId":11,"format":"RAW","id":1064,"deviceId":
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>0,
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>"h
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>yp
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>ervisorType":"KVM"}},"executeInSequence":false,"options":{},"wait":0}}
>>> > > >> >>>>>]
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >}
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(AgentManager-Handler-12:null) Seq 4-1248669612:
>>> Processing:
>>> > > {
>>> > > >> >> >>Ans: ,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer":{"newData":{
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>"o
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>rg
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>.a
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>pache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"size":2621440000,"path
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>":
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>"9
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>c4
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>40d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","accountId":0,"format":"RAW","id"
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>:0
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>}}
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>,"
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >result":true,"wait":0}}]
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >}
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
>>> > 4-1248669612:
>>> > > >> >> >> >>Received: {
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Ans: , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags:
>>> 10, {
>>> > > >> >> >> >>CopyCmdAnswer
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >} }
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>>> > > >> >>NicProfile[
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >*1092-801-null*-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged of type
>>> > Public
>>> > > >> >>from
>>> > > >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >nics
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged later
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1093-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.1.1-vl
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>/4
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >4
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic
>>> will
>>> > > be
>>> > > >> >> >>plugged
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >later
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1094-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.3.1-vl
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>/4
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >3
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic
>>> will
>>> > > be
>>> > > >> >> >>plugged
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >later
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>/3
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >004
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic
>>> will
>>> > > be
>>> > > >> >> >>plugged
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >later
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl
>>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
>>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
>>> > > >> >> >> >>>/3
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >004
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Thanks,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:54, Joris van Lieshout
>>> > > >> >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Just the start of the VR should be sufficient.
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 13:48, "Andrija Panic" <
>>> > andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> >> >>wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >just to be sure - you want me to capture the log
>>> from the
>>> > > >> >>moment
>>> > > >> >> >>I
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>reboot
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >router - or you want me to stop it, then start
>>> capturing
>>> > > log,
>>> > > >> >>and
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>start it
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >(and continue capture untill ethnull errors inside
>>> VR) ?
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Thanks,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:39, Joris van Lieshout
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the answers. In deed your situation is
>>> > > different
>>> > > >> >>so
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>PV/HVM is
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> not the issue.
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> When reading back the log output you have provided
>>> I
>>> > > noted
>>> > > >> >>that
>>> > > >> >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>VR
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> messages log indicates that it's waiting for
>>> ethnull to
>>> > > be
>>> > > >> >>up.
>>> > > >> >> >> >>This
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>raises
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the question where null was introduced instead of
>>> 1.
>>> > The
>>> > > >> ACS
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>management
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> log output you send was, what I think, later down
>>> the
>>> > > road
>>> > > >> >> >>where
>>> > > >> >> >> >>ACS
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>gives
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> up trying to wait for the VR to come up. If you
>>> would
>>> > > >> >>capture
>>> > > >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> job-executor in the management log from
>>> startCommand
>>> > till
>>> > > >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>exception,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> do you see anywhere a mention of ethnull? You might
>>> > need
>>> > > to
>>> > > >> >> >>reed
>>> > > >> >> >> >>into
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> DirectAgent executing the startCommand to find a
>>> clue.
>>> > > The
>>> > > >> >> >>thing
>>> > > >> >> >> >>is
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>that I
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> only have experience with XS based environment so I
>>> > > cannot
>>> > > >> >> >>point
>>> > > >> >> >> >>you
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>to
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the exact output to look for. On XS, at least, it
>>> is
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> "[c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
>>> > > >> >>(DirectAgent-351:ctx-4a51bb9e)
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>Created a
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> vif e4c362bd-764b-f651-dc9a-1abd5cb33c43 on 1"
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 10:48, "Andrija Panic" <
>>> > > >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> >> >> >>wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Deen,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >no, in DB there is field "vlan_id" with value
>>> > > "untagged" -
>>> > > >> >> >>that
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >"vlan://untagged" is shown from ACS gui, and is
>>> used
>>> > in
>>> > > >> API
>>> > > >> >> >>call
>>> > > >> >> >> >>(or
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >better
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >said commands that are seen in management server
>>> > logs).
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Best,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 10:37, Daan Hoogland
>>> > > >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do not just assign a second net vlan://500 You
>>> have
>>> > > one
>>> > > >> >>like
>>> > > >> >> >> >>that
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>and
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> you don't want conflicting nets using the same
>>> > vlan. I
>>> > > >> am
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>wondering
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> why 'untagged' comes out as 'vlan://untagged'. I
>>> > think
>>> > > >> >>that
>>> > > >> >> >>is
>>> > > >> >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bug. Did you find the string 'vlan://untagged'
>>> in
>>> > your
>>> > > >> >>db?
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Andrija Panic
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi Joris,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > thank you for taking time to address this
>>> issue :)
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > So...:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - I'm on KVM (stock CentOS 6.2 patched by
>>> Inktank
>>> > > for
>>> > > >> >>CEPH
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>support),
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>OS
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Centos 6.5, libvirt 1.2.3 compiled.
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - ACS 4.3 having problems, ACS 4.2.1 was fine
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - not XS, so I guess no answers for this part
>>> :)
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - guest_os_id is 184 = Debian 7 x64
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - SVM = systemvm-kvm-4.3 = os type 184 =
>>> Debian 7
>>> > > x64
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > This worked previously on 4.2.1 = template was
>>> > > >> ofcourse
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>systemvm-kvm-4.2
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > but that was also Debian 7 x64 type... so this
>>> > > should
>>> > > >> >>not
>>> > > >> >> >>be
>>> > > >> >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>issues
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > (guest not supported by host...)
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The only thing that might be out of
>>> "standard" =
>>> > all
>>> > > >> >>SVMs
>>> > > >> >> >> >>are on
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>CEPH
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > there are official docs on altering database
>>> to
>>> > make
>>> > > >> >>some
>>> > > >> >> >>new
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>System
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Offering as default for SSVM and CPVM - what I
>>> > did,
>>> > > I
>>> > > >> >>also
>>> > > >> >> >> >>have
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>done
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>same
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > config in DB, to make VR use another System
>>> > Offering
>>> > > >> as
>>> > > >> >> >> >>default
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>-
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>which
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > NOT explained in the docs - you could use
>>> "Change
>>> > > >> >> >> >>Offering..."
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>button
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>on
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > exiting, shutdown VR to change it per docs...
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > But still this worked all fine on 4.2.1...
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - regarding /var/cache/cloud/cmdline the
>>> content
>>> > is
>>> > > >> >> >>folowing
>>> > > >> >> >> >>at
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> moment
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > root@r-801-VM:~# cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > vpccidr=10.0.0.0/8 domain=cscloud.internal
>>> > > >> dns1=8.8.8.8
>>> > > >> >> >> dns2=
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> template=domP
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > name=r-801-VM eth0ip=169.254.0.75
>>> > > eth0mask=255.255.0.0
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>type=vpcrouter
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > disable_rp_filter=true
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Also please note that only eth1 does not have
>>> IP
>>> > > info,
>>> > > >> >> >>eth0
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>(control
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 169.xxx) and all other eh2 and up that are
>>> used
>>> > for
>>> > > >> >>Tiers
>>> > > >> >> >> >>get IP
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>info
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> fine.
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I could also manually add IP for eth1 (public
>>> NIC)
>>> > > and
>>> > > >> >> >>start
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>ifup
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>eth1 -
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and it works fine, but adding new IP Port
>>> > Forwarding
>>> > > >> >>etc
>>> > > >> >> >>does
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>not
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>work...
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Daan or somebody said it could be realted to
>>> my
>>> > > >> >>"Public"
>>> > > >> >> >> >>network
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>(in
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Zones, Physical Network, eth1 listing) is NOT
>>> > tagged
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>(vlan://untagged)...
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Interestingly the only VR that does work fine
>>> is
>>> > the
>>> > > >> VR
>>> > > >> >> >>used
>>> > > >> >> >> >>in
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>Shared
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > network, but that VR is using IP from Guest IP
>>> > range
>>> > > >> >>(also
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>efectively
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > public IPs but on vlan 500)
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I was instructed to try to change Public IP
>>> range
>>> > > from
>>> > > >> >> >> >>untagged
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>to
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>vlan
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 500, but I'm not sure how to do this, if
>>> there is
>>> > > any
>>> > > >> >>way
>>> > > >> >> >>at
>>> > > >> >> >> >>all
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>(editing
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "vlan" table and changing to vlan 500 does not
>>> > work,
>>> > > >> >>after
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>rebooting
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>VR
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > from ACS gui).
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > :)
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > So, not sure what is roughly expected date for
>>> > 4.4,
>>> > > >> but
>>> > > >> >> >>right
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>now,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>I'm
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > pretty stuck with a big problem of all VPC not
>>> > > >> >> >>operational at
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>all...
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 30 May 2014 08:27, Joris van Lieshout <
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan asked me to have a look at this as well.
>>> > > Looking
>>> > > >> >>at
>>> > > >> >> >>you
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>issue I
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> recall having seen something similar. Back
>>> then
>>> > > when
>>> > > >> >> >> >>upgrading
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>4.2.1
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>to
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 4.3 I though it had to do with out own custom
>>> > build
>>> > > >> >>svm
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>template.
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Let me fire off some questions before
>>> explaining
>>> > > what
>>> > > >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >>cause
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>was
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>in
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> our
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> case. :)
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what hypervisor (and version) are you
>>> using?
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - if XS, is the new VR a para-virtualised
>>> > instance
>>> > > >> >>(PV)
>>> > > >> >> >>or
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>hardware
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> assisted (HVM)? Do a "xe vm-param-list" on
>>> the VR
>>> > > >> uuid
>>> > > >> >> >>and
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>check
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>that
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> param PV-args is set and HVM-boot-policy is
>>> > unset.
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the VR in ACS
>>> > (guest_os_id
>>> > > >> in
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>vm_instance
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>table
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> and match with table guest_os)
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the SVM template?
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Now for the explaining. :)
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> In our case the OS type of the new template
>>> was
>>> > not
>>> > > >> >> >> >>supported
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>on
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer version we are running. Therefore
>>> the
>>> > VR
>>> > > >> was
>>> > > >> >> >> >>started
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>by
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>XS
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>as
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> a
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> HVM guest. System vms on XS rely on the
>>> arguments
>>> > > >> >>passed
>>> > > >> >> >>to
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>them
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>in
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> PV-args param (ends up on the guest in
>>> > > >> >> >> >>/var/cache/cloud/cmdline
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>which in
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> turn is used by cloud-early-config) in order
>>> to
>>> > > work.
>>> > > >> >> >> >>cmdline
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>contains
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> NIC configuration information.
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So, long story short, if a VR gets started
>>> as a
>>> > HVM
>>> > > >> it
>>> > > >> >> >>will
>>> > > >> >> >> >>not
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>get
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> information needed to configure it's NICs.
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Workaround
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We corrected the os_type_id in the DB (yes I
>>> know
>>> > > >> >>editing
>>> > > >> >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>DB
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>is
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> something you usually don't want but there
>>> is no
>>> > > >> other
>>> > > >> >> >>way
>>> > > >> >> >> >>in
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>this
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>case)
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of the existing VR's and of the
>>> systemvmtemplate
>>> > to
>>> > > >> >> >> >>something
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>supported
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> by
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer.
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29/05/14 12:18, "Andrija Panic"
>>> > > >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >They are 2 traffic types on 1 physical net
>>> (that
>>> > > is
>>> > > >> >>both
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>tagged
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>vlan
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 500,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >and untagged packets travel over same KVM
>>> > bridge,
>>> > > >> and
>>> > > >> >> >>over
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>eth1
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>to
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> outside
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >world)...
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland
>>> > > >> >> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are these two traffic types in one
>>> physical
>>> > net?
>>> > > >> or
>>> > > >> >> >>two
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>physical
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>nets
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the same interface (seems wrong).
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jayapal
>>> > Reddy
>>> > > >> >>Uradi
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I don't think editing DB table will
>>> work.
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -Jayapal
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija
>>> Panic
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's like this:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have public subnet /24.
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is dedicated for Guest traffic
>>> (vlan
>>> > > 500)
>>> > > >> >>and
>>> > > >> >> >>the
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>second
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dedicated to Public traffic/network (no
>>> > vlan
>>> > > >> >>tags,
>>> > > >> >> >> >>that
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>is
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> untagged
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> packets)
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Both vlan500 and untagged packets
>>> travel
>>> > over
>>> > > >> >> >>physical
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>eth1
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>interface on
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> hypervisors and can reach Internet.
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 May 2014 11:06, Daan Hoogland
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM,
>>> Andrija
>>> > > >> >>Panic <
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> 500
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> is 500 the vlan of your guestnetwork
>>> or
>>> > your
>>> > > >> >> >>physical
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>network?
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wouldn't want to have two nets with
>>> vlan
>>> > > 500!
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> --
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Daan
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija Panić
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://admintweets.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Andrija Panić
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >--
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >--
>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>>> > > >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>> > > >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >>
>>> > > >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >--
>>> > > >> >> >
>>> > > >> >> >Andrija Panić
>>> > > >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>> > > >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >>
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> >--
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> >Andrija Panić
>>> > > >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > http://admintweets.com
>>> > > >> >--------------------------------------
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Andrija Panić
>>> > > > --------------------------------------
>>> > > > http://admintweets.com
>>> > > > --------------------------------------
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > >
>>> > > Andrija Panić
>>> > > --------------------------------------
>>> > > http://admintweets.com
>>> > > --------------------------------------
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Andrija Panić
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> http://admintweets.com
>>> --------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>
>
