> On March 21, 2014, 8:07 p.m., Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApMkIX1Ygx8zdHhqV2RETy05SDU1WER3Z2JEN3ktZHc&usp=sharing > > > > Comparison of 3 configurations, the dynamic compression solution is the > > last one. This test was conducted in a VM with 2 vCPU and 4 GB RAM on a > > AMD E2-1800. > >
Anyone managed to verify the results? Comments or thoughts? - Laszlo ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/#review38181 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 20, 2014, 7:53 p.m., Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 20, 2014, 7:53 p.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle, Darren Shepherd, and Prasanna > Santhanam. > > > Repository: cloudstack-git > > > Description > ------- > > CloudStack at first use downloads some 3.5 MB of css and javascript to the > client. With a weak internet connection, this might take a long time. With > gzip compression content can be compressed to 850 KB. > > This version of the patch uses a custom plugin to compress static resources, > so that no dynamic compression is needed at runtime. When the static resource > servlet notices that there is gzipped version of the resource and the client > accepts gzipped content, then it is going to send the gziped version, while > still respects http caching. > > > Diffs > ----- > > client/WEB-INF/web.xml 1af38e1 > client/pom.xml d8dbde7 > server/src/com/cloud/servlet/StaticResourceServlet.java PRE-CREATION > server/test/com/cloud/servlet/StaticResourceServletTest.java PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > yes, tested with firefox and chrome > > > Thanks, > > Laszlo Hornyak > >
