Commit 67fc2f53 Cheers,
Hugo Sent from my iPhone > On 25 feb. 2014, at 22:44, Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com> wrote: > > Who added the dependency on mysql for framework-db? We actually worked hard > to keep that depending on jdbc only. It should not depend on mysql. We need > to fix that. > > --Alex > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers >> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:34 AM >> To: <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: developers and mysql >> >> Heya, >> >> Just pushed a change that will make the database work again. :-) >> >> >> @Alex. The mysql jar used to be pulled in as a dependency from framework- >> db. As the client target is responsible for building the war file for the >> packages including this in the client pom would also put it in the war file >> and >> in the packages. >> >> I think i have an elegant solution, its now included as a dependency for both >> the database deploy and the jetty:run target. Which makes it effectively a >> "provided" library for the purpose of our maven build. See commit >> 8e6b86ae23dce802044388c5420ff61511d7115b and >> e883877c7a6f9df04b572afd4ee5f10d265bcc3a. >> >> I can deploy a database and start the jetty:run target now without any >> trouble (at least not more trouble than usual ;-) ) >> >> My next step is to clean up some of the dependencies. I think that only >> cloud-framework-db should have a provided dependency on mysql. It's the >> only piece of source code that actually needs the mysql driver to be present >> during compilation for the optional HA configuration. There are some test >> classes that depend on database functionally but those should be moved to >> an integration test profile that could include the database driver, those >> tests >> are disabled anyway so they don't cause any trouble now. >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Hugo >> >>> On 25 feb. 2014, at 06:39, Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karut...@citrix.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Can we move the mysql-connector-java dependency to the parent >> POM(SOURCE-ROOT/pom.xml) and define it different scopes for each profile? >>> >>> ie) >>> >>> >>> <profile> >>> <id>developer</id> >>> <dependencies> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>mysql</groupId> >>> <artifactId>mysql-connector-java</artifactId> >>> <scope>compile</scope> >>> </dependency> >>> </dependencies> >>> </profile> >>> <profile> >>> <id>production</id> >>> <dependencies> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>mysql</groupId> >>> <artifactId>mysql-connector-java</artifactId> >>> <scope>provided</scope> >>> </dependency> >>> </dependencies> >>> </profile> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> ~Rajani >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 24-Feb-2014, at 11:41 pm, Hugo Trippaers >>> <trip...@gmail.com<mailto:trip...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Indeed, >>> >>> I've been fighting with maven all day to get the development profile >>> to include MySql. No luck yet, will give it another shot tomorrow :-) >>> >>> Hugo >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On 24 feb. 2014, at 18:21, David Nalley >>> <da...@gnsa.us<mailto:da...@gnsa.us>> wrote: >>> >>> So it should be ok to include the jar in non-default builds. developer >>> and deploydb are not what we'd expect a normal user to consume. >>> (Anyone else's head spinning?) >>> >>> --David >>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:44 AM, John Kinsella >>> <j...@stratosec.co<mailto:j...@stratosec.co>> wrote: >>> I created CLOUDSTACK-6157 over the weekend to track this. Not sure >> adding the jar after compile will help the deploydb target, but will give it >> a try >> this morning. >>> >>> Could we set up the pom.xmls to use the jar for execution if it's found in >> the user/system classpaths while respecting the legal requirements? >>> >>> Rayees' suggestion for cloud.spec makes sense for the RPM builds, but >> doesn't affect the developer issues. >>> >>> -He who needs more maven experience >>> >>>> On Feb 24, 2014, at 7:36 AM, Hugo Trippaers >>> <h...@trippaers.nl<mailto:h...@trippaers.nl>> wrote: >>> >>> Heya, >>> >>> as the mysql dependency is now set to provided in all the poms to fix our >> license compliancy the jetty target and the deployed targets are not working. >>> >>> I'm trying to configure an optional profile to enable those targets to >>> include >> the mysql dependency while executing, but so far no luck. If anyone has >> some bright ideas on how to do this i'm all ears. In the meantime the best >> solutions i've found to continue working is to copy the mysql jar file into >> the >> directory client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.4.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/ by >> hand after running mvm install and before running the jetty target (just >> don't >> run mvn clean). >>> >>> Hopefully a better solution in the near future. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Hugo >