On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Hugo Trippaers <trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 18 feb. 2014, at 20:09, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > > > > I don't understand why it's a blocker for release. > > > > 1. There is no correlated BUG ID. > There was a bug id, it was closed as it was resolved and committed to the > 4.3-forward tree. > Sorry, I didn't see a bug id on either 4.3( d38a50343130f6f147e2c9c7b2e32a43f31c7e6b) or the commit it refer to picked from: 6d0dbf59683e1878533c8c985f26f18a1d69e1c1 > > > 2. Unit test is good, but unit test is not a blocker for release > > 3. If what's missing is only a check for input value, I don't think it's > a > > blocker. > > It means that with this RC users can't use the Nicira gateway. It will > throw an error when the network transitions from allocated to implemented. > Then that can potentially be a blocker issue. But still, the above information can not be known in the above commit or the references in Daan's comment, which caused confusion I believe. --Sheng > Cheers, > > Hugo > > > > > --Sheng > > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi < > > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > >> Daan > >> > >> Sorry I missed it. what is the impact of not including the fix? Is it > >> really a blocker? > >> > >> > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=d38a50343130f6f147e2c9c7b2e32a43f31c7e6b > >> > >> > >> Thanks > >> Animesh > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 4:26 AM > >>> To: dev > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) > >>> > >>> -1 (binding) > >>> > >>> tested vlan based standalone network > >>> tested vlan based bridged network > >>> tested vpc with vlan based gateway and - tier network tested vpc with > >> nicira > >>> based gateway and - tier network > >>> > >>> All tests included creation of an instance and pinging the router from > >> the > >>> instance. > >>> > >>> All tests passed in the end but a note on the side is that all vlan > >> based tests > >>> didn't pass the ping test first time around. interface were created > with > >> no ip > >>> and after manually assigning ips, the routers still couldn't be pinged, > >>> > >>> For no obvious reason they passed after destroying the network and > >>> recreating it. This worries me but will lead to a +0 as such. I can not > >> yet point > >>> to a bug that causes this. > >>> > >>> My -1 is due to another issue: a fix submitted to the 4.3-forward > branch > >>> wasn't cherry-picked to this rc. See my earlier mail [1]. I had assumed > >> it > >>> would be included due to [2]. > >>> > >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/sujzvfefxsohurt5 > >>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/n2q46ovlkvgyunyk > >>> > >>> kind regards, > >>> Daan Hoogland > >>> > >>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri > >>> <srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com> wrote: > >>>> Thanks Geoff, I did not have a setup to verify again, I just brought > >> one up > >>> and that failure was a false alarm. Dedicate vlan range test passed in > >> the > >>> next run. > >>>> > >>>> So, it is a +1 from my side > >>>> > >>>> Sent from HTC > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ----- Reply message ----- > >>>> From: "Geoff Higginbottom" <geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> > >>>> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > >>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) > >>>> Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 5:11 AM > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I've update the Jira ticket with the following comment: > >>>> > >>>> I have tried to reproduce this manually and have not been able to re- > >>> create the issue. Added a new Guest VLAN Range in addition to the > >> existing > >>> range, then dedicated to a normal user account, all successful, and all > >> on the > >>> latest RC (fifth round). > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> > >>>> Geoff Higginbottom > >>>> > >>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 > >>>> > >>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Srikanteswararao Talluri > >>>> [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com] > >>>> Sent: 17 February 2014 22:29 > >>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) > >>>> > >>>> There is a new test failure in this RC which is a regression from > >>>> previous RC. Created a bug for this > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6131 > >>>> > >>>> > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-4.3/job/test-smoke-m > >>>> atrix > >>>> -4.3/1194/suite=test_guest_vlan_range/testReport/integration.smoke.tes > >>>> t_gue > >>>> > >>> st_vlan_range/TestDedicateGuestVlanRange/test_dedicateGuestVlanRange/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On KVM(CentOS 6.3)/Test Run: #1193 > >>>> -------- > >>>> 4 of the test failures are not valid because snapshots, scaling VM are > >> not > >>> supported on KVM Hypervisor and 5 more intermittent test script/env > issue > >>> related to ssh. > >>>> 1 failure related to dedicated guest VLAN range looks like a bug > >>>> ------- > >>>> Link to reports: > >>>> > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1193/testRepo > >>>> rt/ > >>>> > >>>> -------- > >>>> Total:98 > >>>> Fail :10 > >>>> Skip :2 > >>>> -------- > >>>> > >>>> name pass fail > skip > >>>> test_loadbalance/ 0 4 > 0 > >>>> test_guest_vlan_range/ 0 1 > 0 > >>>> test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/ 3 0 > 0 > >>>> test_non_contigiousvlan/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_reset_vm_on_reboot/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_resource_detail/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_scale_vm/ 0 1 > 0 > >>>> test_ssvm/ 10 0 > 0 > >>>> test_network/ 7 0 > 0 > >>>> test_disk_offerings/ 3 0 > 0 > >>>> test_volumes/ 9 0 > 0 > >>>> test_affinity_groups/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_routers/ 9 0 > 0 > >>>> test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2 0 0 > >>>> test_network_acl/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_vm_life_cycle/ 9 1 > 0 > >>>> test_privategw_acl/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_internal_lb/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_deploy_vm/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_global_settings/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_nic/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_public_ip_range/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_iso/ 5 0 > 1 > >>>> test_service_offerings/ 4 0 > 0 > >>>> test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_regions/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_templates/ 7 0 > 1 > >>>> test_vpc_vpn/ 2 0 > 0 > >>>> test_vm_snapshots/ 0 3 > 0 > >>>> test_portable_publicip/ 2 0 > 0 > >>>> test_pvlan/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> -------- > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On XenServer6.2/Test Run: #1194 > >>>> -------- > >>>> 5 failures are intermittent test script/env issues related to ssh and > >>>> 1 failure in dedicated guest vlan range looks like a bug > >>>> ------- > >>>> Link to reports: > >>>> > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1194/testRepo > >>>> rt/ > >>>> > >>>> -------- > >>>> Total:98 > >>>> Fail :6 > >>>> Skip :2 > >>>> -------- > >>>> > >>>> name pass fail > skip > >>>> test_loadbalance/ 3 0 > 0 > >>>> test_guest_vlan_range/ 0 1 > 0 > >>>> test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/ 3 0 > 0 > >>>> test_non_contigiousvlan/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_reset_vm_on_reboot/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_resource_detail/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_scale_vm/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_ssvm/ 10 0 > 0 > >>>> test_network/ 7 0 > 0 > >>>> test_disk_offerings/ 3 0 > 0 > >>>> test_volumes/ 9 0 > 0 > >>>> test_affinity_groups/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_routers/ 9 0 > 0 > >>>> test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2 0 0 > >>>> test_network_acl/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_vm_life_cycle/ 9 1 > 0 > >>>> test_privategw_acl/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_internal_lb/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_deploy_vm/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_global_settings/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_nic/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_public_ip_range/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_iso/ 5 0 > 1 > >>>> test_service_offerings/ 4 0 > 0 > >>>> test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_regions/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> test_templates/ 7 0 > 1 > >>>> test_vpc_vpn/ 2 0 > 0 > >>>> test_vm_snapshots/ 0 4 > 0 > >>>> test_portable_publicip/ 2 0 > 0 > >>>> test_pvlan/ 1 0 > 0 > >>>> -------- > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> ~Talluri > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 17/02/14 10:57 am, "Animesh Chaturvedi" > >>>> <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 (binding) verified release artifacts, tested with devcloud. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks > >>>>> Animesh > >>>>> > >>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:25 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" > >>>>> <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi All, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > >>>>>> > >>>>>> vote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a > >>>>>> few times, I would like to close out this VOTE little sooner by > >>>>>> Tuesday morning PST. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h > >>>>>> = > >>>>>> ref > >>>>>> s/heads/4.3 > >>>>>> Commit: adf4dd59270917b1607940d7064748bd438cbbcc > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> List of changes: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> New Features in 4.3: > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Improvement in 4.3: > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Issues fixed in 4.3 > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Known Issues in 4.3: > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > >>>>>> > >>>>>> location): > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Testing instructions are here: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+ > >>> p > >>>>>> r > >>>>>> oce > >>>>>> dure > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours (Tuesday morning PST) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > >>>>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ ] +1 approve > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? > >>>> Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support< > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- > >>> infrastructure-support/> offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack > >>> Environments. > >>>> > >>>> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses > >>>> > >>>> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 > >>>> training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > >>>> 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. > >>>> Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > >>>> 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, > >>>> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > >>>> 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, > >>>> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > >>>> 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, > >>>> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > >>>> 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, > >>>> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > >>>> > >>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are > >> intended > >>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views > >> or > >>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not > necessarily > >>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not > >> the > >>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action > based > >>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the > >> sender > >>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd > is a > >>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP > is > >> a > >>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape > >>> Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated > in > >>> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is > a > >>> registered trademark. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Daan > >> >
