Hi Sanjay, Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
I am going to perform the upgrade on our production servers in the next 1-2 hours. Will let you know the outcome. This is our fourth attempt to upgrade so I hope there's no other issue crop up. Can I confirm that this API command will populate all the resources_count table for all the accounts and domains? http://localhost:8096/?command=updateResourceCount&account=admin&domainId=1 Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Sanjay Tripathi <sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com>wrote: > Indra, > > The steps are correct. > Please follow the steps and let me know if you need any help. > > This issue got fixed in 4.2-forward branch with this commit: > 38bbfdc89a50bbb9464700d202d1cfa7b7955953 > > --Sanjay > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id] > > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:33 AM > > To: Alena Prokharchyk > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack > 4.2.0 > > > > Hi Alena, > > > > Good day to you, and thank you for your confirmation! > > > > Can I confirm that this is what I need to do: > > > > (1) Before upgrade, run the script to insert the records into > resource_count > > table for existing accounts/domains. > > (2) Perform the upgrade (from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0); > > (3) After the upgrade, run the API script to populate the records. > > > > The above will fix the issues on the existing accounts/domains, and > future > > accounts/domains will not be affected and will run as per normal after > the > > upgrade. > > > > Can I confirm that my above understanding is correct? > > > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you. > > > > Cheers. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Alena Prokharchyk < > > alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Indra, > > > > > > Please see inline. > > > > > > -alena. > > > > > > On 10/2/13 8:21 PM, "Indra Pramana" <in...@sg.or.id> wrote: > > > > > > >Hi Alena, > > > > > > > > > > > >Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. > > > > > > > > > > > >Does it mean that later after the upgrade, for every newly created > > > >accounts/domains, I will need to apply the temporary fix all the time? > > > > > > No. You should do it just for the accounts/domains existing before the > > > upgrade. For new accounts, the code should do it automatically as a > > > part of account creation. > > > > > > > > > > Will it cause any issues if I run the MySQL script again later, e.g. > > > >will it cause duplicate entries for existing accounts/domains? > > > > > > There is a constraint in resource_type table on type/account_id and > > > type/domain_id, so before running the script, you have to make sure > > > that the entry doesn't exist already. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Looking forward to your reply, thank you. > > > > > > > >Cheers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Alena Prokharchyk > > > ><alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >Indra, > > > > > > > > > > > >the issue would impact only existing accounts/domains. For all newly > > > >created accounts/domains, you won't see it. By "temporary" Wei meant > > > >that in the future the problem should be fixed in the CloudStack > > > >upgrade code; so before the fix is in, this temporary solution > > > >should be applied by the customer manually. > > > > > > > > > > > >Answering your other question how to fix the count. For that, you > > > >have to execute the API updateResourceCount. Here is the example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://localhost:8096/?command=updateResourceCount&account=admin&d > > omai > > > nId= > > > >1 > > > > > > > > > > > >-Alena. > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Indra Pramana <in...@sg.or.id> > > > >Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > > > >Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 9:05 AM > > > >To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > > > >Subject: Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack > > > >4.2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi Wei Zhou, > > > > > > > > > > > >Thank you for the temporary solution, I tried to execute the scripts > > > >and I can see that the records are being inserted into the > resource_count > > table! > > > >:) > > > > > > > > > > > >mysql> select * from resource_count where account_id=2; > > > >+------+------------+-----------+-------------------+-------+ > > > >| id | account_id | domain_id | type | count | > > > >+------+------------+-----------+-------------------+-------+ > > > >| 17 | 2 | NULL | user_vm | 33 | > > > >| 18 | 2 | NULL | public_ip | 4 | > > > >| 19 | 2 | NULL | volume | 51 | > > > >| 20 | 2 | NULL | snapshot | 0 | > > > >| 21 | 2 | NULL | template | 39 | > > > >| 22 | 2 | NULL | project | 0 | > > > >| 23 | 2 | NULL | network | 1 | > > > >| 24 | 2 | NULL | vpc | 0 | > > > >| 6342 | 2 | NULL | cpu | 0 | > > > >| 6597 | 2 | NULL | memory | 0 | > > > >| 6852 | 2 | NULL | primary_storage | 0 | > > > >| 7107 | 2 | NULL | secondary_storage | 0 | > > > >+------+------------+-----------+-------------------+-------+ > > > >12 rows in set (0.00 sec) > > > > > > > > > > > >When you're saying temporary solution, what do you mean by that and > > > >how will that impact us? Do we need to run the temporary solution > > > >regularly in the future, or only during upgrade? > > > > > > > > > > > >I also noted that the count value of the newly created records are > all 0. > > > >How would that impact us, and how it can be updated with the actual > > value? > > > >Will the data/value be updated over time? > > > > > > > > > > > >Any other things we need to take note of? > > > > > > > > > > > >If this solution works for us, then I will schedule another upgrade > > > >attempt (the fourth one!) tomorrow. > > > > > > > > > > > >Looking forward to your reply, thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > >Cheers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >For a temporary solution, log in the database, try again after run > > > >insert into resource_count(domain_id,type) select id,"cpu" from > > > >domain; insert into resource_count(domain_id,type) select id,"memory" > > > >from domain; insert into resource_count(domain_id,type) select > > id,"primary_storage" > > > >from > > > >domain; > > > >insert into resource_count(domain_id,type) select > > id,"secondary_storage" > > > >from domain; > > > >insert into resource_count(account_id,type) select id,"cpu" from > > > >account; insert into resource_count(account_id,type) select > > > >id,"memory" from account; insert into resource_count(account_id,type) > > > >select id,"primary_storage" > > > >from account; > > > >insert into resource_count(account_id,type) select > > id,"secondary_storage" > > > >from account; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2013/10/2 Valery Ciareszka (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> [ > > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4627 > > > ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4627>? > > > >> page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpan > > > >> el& > > > >> focusedCommentId=13784006#comment-13784006 ] > > > >> > > > >> Valery Ciareszka commented on CLOUDSTACK-4627: > > > >> ---------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > >> Was it really commited to 4.2.0 branch ? I see old version in > > > >> latest source package: > > > >> > > > >> wget > > > >http://www.eu.apache.org/dist/cloudstack/releases/4.2.0/ > > > ><http://www.eu.apache.org/dist/cloudstack/releases/4.2.0/> > > > >> apache-cloudstack-4.2.0-src.tar.bz2 > > > >> tar jxfv apache-cloudstack-4.2.0-src.tar.bz2 > > > >> > > > >> [root@ad011d apache-cloudstack-4.2.0-src]# grep -A9 > > > >> canVmRestartOnAnotherServer > > > >> server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java > > > >> public boolean canVmRestartOnAnotherServer(long vmId) { > > > >> List<VolumeVO> vols = _volsDao.findCreatedByInstance(vmId); > > > >> for (VolumeVO vol : vols) { > > > >> if (!vol.isRecreatable() && !vol.getPoolType().isShared()) { return > > > >> false; } } return true; } > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > HA not working, User VM wasn't Migrated > > > >> > --------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > > >> > Key: CLOUDSTACK-4627 > > > >> > URL: > > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4627 > > > ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4627> > > > >> > Project: CloudStack > > > >> > Issue Type: Bug > > > >> > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > > > >default.) > > > >> > Components: Hypervisor Controller, KVM, Management Server > > Affects > > > >> > Versions: 4.2.0 > > > >> > Environment: CentOS 6.3 64bit > > > >> > Reporter: Naoki Sakamoto > > > >> > Assignee: edison su > > > >> > Attachments: > > 20130906_HA_SystemVM_Migration_OK_But_UserVM_NG.zip, > > > >> 20130909_HA_UserVM_Migration_NG.zip > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > 1. We made one of KVM Host Power OFF by push power button of > > > >> > hardware > > > >> for High Availability Test. > > > >> > 2. Vritual Router / Secodary Storage VM / Console Proxy VM is > > > >>Migrated. > > > >> > But User VM wasn't Migrated. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > > > >> (v6.1#6144) > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2013/10/2 Indra Pramana <in...@sg.or.id> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Wei Zhou, > > > >> > > > >> Thanks for your e-mail. > > > >> > > > >> Do you have any recommendation or suggestion on how we can resolve > > > >> the problem? I am not a CloudStack developer (just a normal user) > > > >> so we are > > > >at > > > >> loss on how we can resolve this issue. We are not able to upgrade > > > >> to > > > >4.2.0 > > > >> because of this new problem, after we managed to get around quite a > > > >> lot > > > >of > > > >> bumps on our road to 4.2.0. > > > >> > > > >> Looking forward to your reply, thank you. > > > >> > > > >> Cheers. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hi Indra, > > > >> > > > > >> > It is a java file, not a script. > > > >> > ./server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
