First step is for me to get this working for KVM, though. :)

Once I do that, I can perhaps make modifications to the storage framework
and hypervisor plug-ins to refactor the logic and such.


On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Same would work for KVM.
>
> If CreateCommand and DestroyCommand were called at the appropriate times
> by the storage framework, I could move my connect and disconnect logic out
> of the attach/detach logic.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
>> Conversely, if the storage framework called the DestroyCommand for
>> managed storage after the DetachCommand, then I could have had my remove
>> SR/datastore logic placed in the DestroyCommand handling rather than in the
>> DetachCommand handling.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Edison's plug-in calls the CreateCommand. Mine does not.
>>>
>>> The initial approach that was discussed during 4.2 was for me to modify
>>> the attach/detach logic only in the XenServer and VMware hypervisor
>>> plug-ins.
>>>
>>> Now that I think about it more, though, I kind of would have liked to
>>> have the storage framework send a CreateCommand to the hypervisor before
>>> sending the AttachCommand if the storage in question was managed.
>>>
>>> Then I could have created my SR/datastore in the CreateCommand and the
>>> AttachCommand would have had the SR/datastore that it was always expecting
>>> (and I wouldn't have had to create the SR/datastore in the AttachCommand).
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Marcus Sorensen 
>>> <shadow...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah, I think it probably is as well, but I figured you'd be in a
>>>> better position to tell.
>>>>
>>>> I see that copyAsync is unsupported in your current 4.2 driver, does
>>>> that mean that there's no template support? Or is it some other call
>>>> that does templating now? I'm still getting up to speed on all of the
>>>> 4.2 changes. I was just looking at CreateCommand in
>>>> LibvirtComputingResource, since that's the only place
>>>> createPhysicalDisk is called, and it occurred to me that CreateCommand
>>>> might be skipped altogether when utilizing storage plugins.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>>>> <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>> > That's an interesting comment, Marcus.
>>>> >
>>>> > It was my intent that it should work with any CloudStack "managed"
>>>> storage
>>>> > that uses an iSCSI target. Even though I'm using CHAP, I wrote the
>>>> code so
>>>> > CHAP didn't have to be used.
>>>> >
>>>> > As I'm doing my testing, I can try to think about whether it is
>>>> generic
>>>> > enough to keep those names or not.
>>>> >
>>>> > My expectation is that it is generic enough.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>> shadow...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> I added a comment to your diff. In general I think it looks good,
>>>> >> though I obviously can't vouch for whether or not it will work. One
>>>> >> thing I do have reservations about is the adaptor/pool naming. If you
>>>> >> think the code is generic enough that it will work for anyone who
>>>> does
>>>> >> an iscsi LUN-per-volume plugin, then it's OK, but if there's anything
>>>> >> about it that's specific to YOUR iscsi target or how it likes to be
>>>> >> treated then I'd say that they should be named something less generic
>>>> >> than iScsiAdmStorage.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>>>> >> <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > Great - thanks!
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Just to give you an overview of what my code does (for when you
>>>> get a
>>>> >> > chance to review it):
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > SolidFireHostListener is registered in
>>>> SolidfirePrimaryDataStoreProvider.
>>>> >> > Its hostConnect method is invoked when a host connects with the CS
>>>> MS. If
>>>> >> > the host is running KVM, the listener sends a
>>>> ModifyStoragePoolCommand to
>>>> >> > the host. This logic was based off of DefaultHostListener.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > The handling of ModifyStoragePoolCommand is unchanged. It invokes
>>>> >> > createStoragePool on the KVMStoragePoolManager. The
>>>> KVMStoragePoolManager
>>>> >> > asks for an adaptor and finds my new one: iScsiAdmStorageAdaptor
>>>> (which
>>>> >> was
>>>> >> > registered in the constructor for KVMStoragePoolManager under the
>>>> key of
>>>> >> > StoragePoolType.Iscsi.toString()).
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > iScsiAdmStorageAdaptor.createStoragePool just makes an instance of
>>>> >> > iScsiAdmStoragePool, adds it to a map, and returns the pointer to
>>>> the
>>>> >> > iScsiAdmStoragePool object. The key of the map is the UUID of the
>>>> storage
>>>> >> > pool.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > When a volume is attached, createPhysicalDisk is invoked for
>>>> managed
>>>> >> > storage rather than getPhysicalDisk. createPhysicalDisk uses
>>>> iscsiadm to
>>>> >> > establish the iSCSI connection to the volume on the SAN and a
>>>> >> > KVMPhysicalDisk is returned to be used in the attach logic that
>>>> follows.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > When a volume is detached, getPhysicalDisk is invoked with the IQN
>>>> of the
>>>> >> > volume if the storage pool in question is managed storage.
>>>> Otherwise, the
>>>> >> > normal vol.getPath() is used.
>>>> iScsiAdmStorageAdaptor.getPhysicalDisk just
>>>> >> > returns a new instance of KVMPhysicalDisk to be used in the detach
>>>> logic.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Once the volume has been detached,
>>>> iScsiAdmStoragePool.deletePhysicalDisk
>>>> >> > is invoked if the storage pool is managed. deletePhysicalDisk
>>>> removes the
>>>> >> > iSCSI connection to the volume using iscsiadm.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>> shadow...@gmail.com
>>>> >> >wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >> Its the log4j properties file in /etc/cloudstack/agent change all
>>>> INFO
>>>> >> to
>>>> >> >> DEBUG.  I imagine the agent just isn't starting, you can tail the
>>>> log
>>>> >> when
>>>> >> >> you try to start the service, or maybe it will spit something out
>>>> into
>>>> >> one
>>>> >> >> of the other files in /var/log/cloudstack/agent
>>>> >> >> On Sep 21, 2013 5:19 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> > This is how I've been trying to query for the status of the
>>>> service (I
>>>> >> >> > assume it could be started this way, as well, by changing
>>>> "status" to
>>>> >> >> > "start" or "restart"?):
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > mtutkowski@ubuntu:/etc/cloudstack/agent$ sudo /usr/sbin/service
>>>> >> >> > cloudstack-agent status
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > I get this back:
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Failed to execute: * could not access PID file for
>>>> cloudstack-agent
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > I've made a bunch of code changes recently, though, so I think
>>>> I'm
>>>> >> going
>>>> >> >> to
>>>> >> >> > rebuild and redeploy everything.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > The debug info sounds helpful. Where can I set enable.debug?
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Thanks, Marcus!
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>> shadow...@gmail.com
>>>> >> >> > >wrote:
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > > OK, will check it out in the next few days. As mentioned, you
>>>> can
>>>> >> set
>>>> >> >> up
>>>> >> >> > > your Ubuntu vm as the management server as well if all else
>>>> fails.
>>>> >>  If
>>>> >> >> > you
>>>> >> >> > > can get to the mgmt server on 8250 from the KVM host, then
>>>> you need
>>>> >> to
>>>> >> >> > > enable.debug on the agent. It won't run without complaining
>>>> loudly
>>>> >> if
>>>> >> >> it
>>>> >> >> > > can't get to the mgmt server, and I didn't see that in your
>>>> agent
>>>> >> log,
>>>> >> >> so
>>>> >> >> > > perhaps its not running. I assume you know how to stop/start
>>>> the
>>>> >> agent
>>>> >> >> on
>>>> >> >> > > KVM via 'service cloud stacks agent'.
>>>> >> >> > > On Sep 21, 2013 3:02 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>> >> >> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>>>> >> >> > > wrote:
>>>> >> >> > >
>>>> >> >> > > > Hey Marcus,
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > I haven't yet been able to test my new code, but I thought
>>>> you
>>>> >> would
>>>> >> >> > be a
>>>> >> >> > > > good person to ask to review it:
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> https://github.com/mike-tutkowski/incubator-cloudstack/commit/ea74b312a8a36801994500407fd54f0cdda55e37
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > All it is supposed to do is attach and detach a data disk
>>>> (that
>>>> >> has
>>>> >> >> > > > guaranteed IOPS) with KVM as the hypervisor. The data disk
>>>> >> happens to
>>>> >> >> > be
>>>> >> >> > > > from SolidFire-backed storage - where we have a 1:1 mapping
>>>> >> between a
>>>> >> >> > > > CloudStack volume and a data disk.
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > There is no support for hypervisor snapshots or stuff like
>>>> that
>>>> >> >> > (likely a
>>>> >> >> > > > future release)...just attaching and detaching a data disk
>>>> in 4.3.
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > Thanks!
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>> >> >> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > > When I re-deployed the DEBs, I didn't remove
>>>> cloudstack-agent
>>>> >> >> first.
>>>> >> >> > > > Would
>>>> >> >> > > > > that be a problem? I just did a sudo apt-get install
>>>> >> >> > cloudstack-agent.
>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>> >> >> > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >> I get the same error running the command manually:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>> >> >> > > > >> mtutkowski@ubuntu:/etc/cloudstack/agent$ sudo
>>>> >> /usr/sbin/service
>>>> >> >> > > > >> cloudstack-agent status
>>>> >> >> > > > >>  * could not access PID file for cloudstack-agent
>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>> >> >> > > > >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>> >> >> > > > >> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> agent.log looks OK to me:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,010 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell]
>>>> >> >> (main:null)
>>>> >> >> > > > Agent
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> started
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,011 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell]
>>>> >> >> (main:null)
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> Implementation Version is 4.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,015 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell]
>>>> >> >> (main:null)
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> agent.properties found at
>>>> >> /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,023 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell]
>>>> >> >> (main:null)
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> Defaulting to using properties file for storage
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,024 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell]
>>>> >> >> (main:null)
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> Defaulting to the constant time backoff algorithm
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,029 INFO  [cloud.utils.LogUtils]
>>>> >> (main:null)
>>>> >> >> > > log4j
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> configuration found at
>>>> /etc/cloudstack/agent/log4j-cloud.xml
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,163 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent]
>>>> (main:null)
>>>> >> id
>>>> >> >> > is 3
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,197 INFO
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>  [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
>>>> (main:null)
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> VirtualRoutingResource _scriptDir to use:
>>>> >> >> scripts/network/domr/kvm
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> However, I wasn't aware that setup.log was important.
>>>> This
>>>> >> seems
>>>> >> >> to
>>>> >> >> > > be
>>>> >> >> > > > a
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> problem, but I'm not sure what it might indicate:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> DEBUG:root:execute:sudo /usr/sbin/service
>>>> cloudstack-agent
>>>> >> status
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> DEBUG:root:Failed to execute: * could not access PID
>>>> file for
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> cloudstack-agent
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> DEBUG:root:execute:sudo /usr/sbin/service
>>>> cloudstack-agent
>>>> >> start
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>> >> >> > > shadow...@gmail.com
>>>> >> >> > > > >wrote:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> Sorry, I saw that in the log, I thought it was the
>>>> agent log
>>>> >> for
>>>> >> >> > > some
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> reason. Is the agent started? That might be the place
>>>> to
>>>> >> look.
>>>> >> >> > There
>>>> >> >> > > > is
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> an
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> agent log for the agent and one for the setup when it
>>>> adds
>>>> >> the
>>>> >> >> > host,
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> both
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> in /var/log
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> On Sep 20, 2013 10:42 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > Is it saying that the MS is at the IP address or the
>>>> KVM
>>>> >> host?
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > The KVM host is at 192.168.233.10.
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > The MS host is at 192.168.233.1.
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > I see this for my host Global Settings parameter:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > hostThe ip address of management server192.168.233.1
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties has a
>>>> >> >> host=192.168.233.1
>>>> >> >> > > > value.
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> shadow...@gmail.com
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > >wrote:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > The log says your mgmt server is 192.168.233.10?
>>>> But you
>>>> >> >> tried
>>>> >> >> > > to
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> telnet
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > to
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > 192.168.233.1? It might be enough to change that in
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties, but you
>>>> may want
>>>> >> to
>>>> >> >> > edit
>>>> >> >> > > > the
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > config
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > as well to tell it the real ms IP.
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > On Sep 20, 2013 10:12 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > wrote:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > Here's what my /etc/network/interfaces file looks
>>>> >> like, if
>>>> >> >> > > that
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> is of
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > interest (the 192.168.233.0 network is the NAT
>>>> network
>>>> >> >> > VMware
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> Fusion
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > set
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > up):
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > auto lo
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > iface lo inet loopback
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > auto eth0
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > iface eth0 inet manual
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > auto cloudbr0
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > iface cloudbr0 inet static
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     address 192.168.233.10
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     netmask 255.255.255.0
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     network 192.168.233.0
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     broadcast 192.168.233.255
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     bridge_ports eth0
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     bridge_fd 5
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     bridge_stp off
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     bridge_maxwait 1
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     post-up route add default gw 192.168.233.2
>>>> metric 1
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     pre-down route del default gw 192.168.233.2
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>>>> <
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > You appear to be correct. This is from the MS
>>>> log
>>>> >> >> (below).
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> Discovery
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > timed
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > out.
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > I'm not sure why this would be. My network
>>>> settings
>>>> >> >> > > shouldn't
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> have
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > changed
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > since the last time I tried this.
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > I am able to ping the KVM host from the MS
>>>> host and
>>>> >> vice
>>>> >> >> > > > versa.
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > I'm even able to manually kick off a VM on the
>>>> KVM
>>>> >> host
>>>> >> >> > and
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> ping from
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > it
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > to the MS host.
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > I am using NAT from my Mac OS X host (also
>>>> running
>>>> >> the
>>>> >> >> CS
>>>> >> >> > > MS)
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> to the
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > VM
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > running KVM (VMware Fusion).
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > 2013-09-20 19:40:40,141 DEBUG
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> [c.c.h.k.d.LibvirtServerDiscoverer]
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > (613487991@qtp-1659933291-3:ctx-6b28dc48)
>>>> Timeout,
>>>> >> to
>>>> >> >> > wait
>>>> >> >> > > > for
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> the
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > host
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > connecting to mgt svr, assuming it is failed
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > 2013-09-20 19:40:40,144 WARN
>>>> >> >>  [c.c.r.ResourceManagerImpl]
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > (613487991@qtp-1659933291-3:ctx-6b28dc48)
>>>> Unable to
>>>> >> >> find
>>>> >> >> > > the
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> server
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > resources at http://192.168.233.10
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > 2013-09-20 19:40:40,145 INFO
>>>> >> >> >  [c.c.u.e.CSExceptionErrorCode]
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > (613487991@qtp-1659933291-3:ctx-6b28dc48)
>>>> Could not
>>>> >> >> find
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> exception:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > com.cloud.exception.DiscoveryException in
>>>> error code
>>>> >> >> list
>>>> >> >> > > for
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > exceptions
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > 2013-09-20 19:40:40,147 WARN
>>>> >>  [o.a.c.a.c.a.h.AddHostCmd]
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > (613487991@qtp-1659933291-3:ctx-6b28dc48)
>>>> Exception:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > com.cloud.exception.DiscoveryException: Unable
>>>> to add
>>>> >> >> the
>>>> >> >> > > host
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > at
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>>
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHostsFull(ResourceManagerImpl.java:778)
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > I do seem to be able to telnet in from my KVM
>>>> host to
>>>> >> >> the
>>>> >> >> > MS
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> host's
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > 8250
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > port:
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > mtutkowski@ubuntu:~$ telnet 192.168.233.1 8250
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > Trying 192.168.233.1...
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > Connected to 192.168.233.1.
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > Escape character is '^]'.
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > --
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > o: 303.746.7302
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > cloud<
>>>> >> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > *™*
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > --
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > o: 303.746.7302
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > cloud<
>>>> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > *™*
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> --
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
>>>> >> >> > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>> *™*
>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>> >> >> > > > >> --
>>>> >> >> > > > >> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> >> >> > > > >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> >> >> > > > >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> >> >> > > > >> o: 303.746.7302
>>>> >> >> > > > >> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
>>>> >> >> > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>> >> >> > > > >> *™*
>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > > --
>>>> >> >> > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> >> >> > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> >> >> > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> >> >> > > > > o: 303.746.7302
>>>> >> >> > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
>>>> >> >> > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>> >> >> > > > > *™*
>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > > > --
>>>> >> >> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> >> >> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> >> >> > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> >> >> > > > o: 303.746.7302
>>>> >> >> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>>> >> >> > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>> >> >> > > > *™*
>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>> >> >> > >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > --
>>>> >> >> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> >> >> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> >> >> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> >> >> > o: 303.746.7302
>>>> >> >> > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>>> >> >> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>> >> >> > *™*
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --
>>>> >> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> >> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> >> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> >> > o: 303.746.7302
>>>> >> > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>>> >> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>> >> > *™*
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> > o: 303.746.7302
>>>> > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>>> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>> > *™*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>> *™*
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> o: 303.746.7302
>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>> *™*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Reply via email to