-1 , vm deployement with new registered template is failing,
It was working on rc 3 release
2025-02-21 11:33:27,220 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher]
(API-Job-Executor-16:ctx-12a2368d job-97) (logid:e31678b7) Unexpected exception
while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.DeployVMCmdB
yAdmin
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to orchestrate start VM
instance
{"id":15,"instanceName":"i-2-15-VM","type":"User","uuid":"c3bdd0bb-08e7-4a54-8620-222d9ae38707"}
due to [Unable to get ans
wer that is of class com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer].
Regards
Kiran
From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Date: Friday, 21 February 2025 at 9:31 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4
+1 (binding)
Regards.
________________________________
From: Rene Peinthor <rene.peint...@linbit.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 21:17
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4
+1 (binding)
Ran Linstor integration tests and some manual clicking.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:15 AM Daan Hoogland <d...@apache.org> wrote:
> packages are ready now
> at http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.19.2.0-RC4/
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 9:38 AM Daan Hoogland <d...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.19.2.0 release candidate, with the following
> > artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.2.0-RC20250220T0932
> > Commit: 4e321d43565951a3856923d680976b8cd4eb1b46
> >
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.2.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 256ABDFB8D89EDE07540BE6ACEF9E802B86FEED4):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > I am in the process of creating convenience packages and will update on
> > those in this mail-thread.
> >
> >
>
