Nobody has bothered to deal with the LICENSE file for the file described below.
Anyone want to take this on, or at least give me the information required? On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote: > Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik....@citrix.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > > > > For now I think cloud-utils is the best option. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer on > > > the source website : > > > "Warning: > > > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha" > > > quality!" > > > > > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus was > > > skeptical. > > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Amogh > > > > > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <alex.hu...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > > > >Amogh, > > > > > > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to > > > >compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can you check > > > >on if you can use this? > > > > > > > ><dependency> > > > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId> > > > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId> > > > > <version>0.3.11</version> > > > ></dependency> > > > > > > > >--Alx > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM > > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > > > >> > > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1? > > > >> > > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons- > > > >> httpclient/commons- > > > >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509Tr > > > >> us > > > >> tM > > > >> anager.java > > > >> > > > >> --Alex > > > >> > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > > > >> > > > > >> > +1 > > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy. > > > >> > > > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <amogh.vase...@citrix.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for > > > >> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in > > > >> > >cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for > > > >> > >easier > > > >>maintenance. > > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good. > > > >> > > > > > >> > >Thanks, > > > >> > >Amogh > > > >> > > > > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <frank.zh...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been > > > >> > >>proven by lots of users. > > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com] > > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM > > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> Hi All, > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package > > > >> > >>>in the codebase : > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/networ > > > >> > >>> k- > > > >> > >>> elements/c > > > >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of > > > >> > >>>httpclient-contribs jar > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > > > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcon > > > >> tr > > > >> > ib31jar. > > > >> > >>> htm > > > >> > >>> ) > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not > > > >> > >>>included instead (probably since it is a contrib jar?) > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> Thanks, > > > >> > >>> Amogh > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
