> -----Original Message-----
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 2:13 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Upgrade path to ACS 4.2 from CCP
>
> Animesh,
>
> Would this have any effect on non-CCP installations?
[Animesh>] No CCP -> ACS upgrade path files will not affects ACS->ACS upgrade
path
>
> I see this move as a positive thing and it would be ideal to have in
> 4.2, but we don't want to risk stability, hence I'm curious on the
> safety and possible issues for non-CCP users.
>
> Thanks
> ilya
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 4:43 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Upgrade path to ACS 4.2 from CCP
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 9:39 AM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade path to ACS 4.2 from CCP
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:01:02PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > > > [Animesh>] Yes this seems late for 4.2, but it makes it easier to
> > > > add
> > > support now. If there is objection we can track it for 4.3.
> > >
> > > Are you sure it's easier to add support now? That basically puts us
> > > in a position where it's *possible* to attempt it. That means we
> > > have to test it, because if things go wrong then we are in a mess
> for 4.3.
> > >
> > > Am I getting it wrong?
> > [Animesh>] Yes it is one upgrade path from 3.0.7 to 4.1 and follow
> > through same upgrade path from 4.1 to 4.2 with couple of SQL files
> > only. . Upgrade from 3.0,4-> 3.0.7 has already been tested in CCP
> > releases and becomes the checkpoint. It was planned to be tested for
> > CCP anyway. Sudha do you see it as a concern. Again if community
> > thinks it is late, we can track for 4.3
>
