There's several places in the by laws that call for Lazy Consensus. Are we discussing modifying all of them or just new committer votes?
On 7/19/13 9:02 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >As it stands now, we currently use a "Lazy Consensus" model (yes Noah, I >know we didn't define that term correctly as of now, but I think that's >a different discussion). We currently have that term defined as: > >> Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes and no >> binding -1 votes. > >I'd like to propose that we change the PMC and committer voting rule to >use the Lazy 2/3 Majority approach defined as: > >> Lazy 2/3 majority votes requires at least 3 binding votes and twice as >> many binding +1 votes as binding -1 votes. > >Are there any objections to me starting a VOTE on this change?
