As it stands now, we currently use a "Lazy Consensus" model (yes Noah, I know we didn't define that term correctly as of now, but I think that's a different discussion). We currently have that term defined as:
> Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes and no > binding -1 votes. I'd like to propose that we change the PMC and committer voting rule to use the Lazy 2/3 Majority approach defined as: > Lazy 2/3 majority votes requires at least 3 binding votes and twice as > many binding +1 votes as binding -1 votes. Are there any objections to me starting a VOTE on this change?
