Apparmor is not installed . Selinux is in permissive mode. I think it's not the 
problem with Selinux

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 4:15 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Unable to start System VM's in KVM Failing with error Domain is
> Tainted with high-privilages
> 
> The tainted message means nothing. Look at /var/log/libvirtd/qemu/v-2-
> VM.log. it might say permission denied to the VM image, vm image missing,
> or that apparmor/selinux is blocking access to the virtio serial socket, or
> something else.
> On May 21, 2013 3:31 AM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > From the log,
> >
> > libvirt version: 0.9.10  and it's is from  package: 21.el6
> > x86-003.build.bos.redhat.com)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Rajesh Battala
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:56 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Unable to start System VM's in KVM Failing with error
> > Domain is
> > > Tainted with high-privilages
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 08:55:23AM +0000, Rajesh Battala wrote:
> > > > This issue I saw while looking at the logs for the issue
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2330 [[Automation]
> > > Failed to deploy VR in KVM].
> > > >
> > > > Build/Code is from the latest master branch. Latest system
> > > > templates
> > are
> > > used.
> > > All the domains are failing on these hosts. So it seems like an
> > environment
> > > problem because my KVM hosts are able to spin up VMs fine on master.
> > >
> > > 2013-05-04 07:12:02.584+0000: 26210: warning :
> qemuDomainObjTaint:1297 :
> > > Domain id=7 name='v-2-VM' uuid=1422832d-be18-352a-a08a-
> 9bbff40e0d14
> > > is tainted: high-privileges
> > > 2013-05-04 07:13:36.851+0000: 26206: error : qemuMonitorIO:574 :
> > > internal error End of file from monitor
> > >
> > > ^ The real error is the monitor EOF.
> > >
> > > More googling reveals this is a possible race condition in libvirt:
> > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-March/msg00051.html
> > >
> > > But I'm not sure if that's what's happening here. Someone with more
> > > libvirt/qemu expertise will have to look at this. :(
> > >
> > > Can the bug report be updated with the version of libvirt? The line
> > numbers
> > > don't match up for the qemuMonitorIO method in the error log.
> > >
> > > I'd follow up on the #virt channel too to see if there's anyone who
> > knows.
> > >
> > > ------------------------
> > > Powered by BigRock.com
> >
> >

Reply via email to