> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 10:33 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" <shadow...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > One thing I'd like to point out, and perhaps its merely subjective,
> > but it seemed like from initial 4.1 feature freeze to a week or two
> > before the rc was supposed to be cut there wasn't much action on bug
> > fixing. It wasn't until the deadlines started becoming imminent that
> > people came back to work on 4.1. Just something to keep in mind when
> discussing extending deadlines.
> 
> Certainly the urgency does set in closer to deadlines.
> 
[Animesh>] Marcus I  did further analysis and it points out that there was 
constant activity in defect fixing since the code freeze date and matches up 
closely with defect creation. Please see attached graph.


Reply via email to