On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 03:03:43PM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> This is not an issue with code, template.properties in QA secondary
> storage folder is incorrect, see below:
> 
> [root@nfs2 3]# more template.properties
> filename=c0c94bfc-15c2-4e7f-9a2e-aec541df4cc1.qcow2
> description=SystemVM Template
> checksum=
> hvm=false
> size=741212160
> qcow2=true
> id=NULL
> public=true
> qcow2.filename=c0c94bfc-15c2-4e7f-9a2e-aec541df4cc1.qcow2
> uniquename=routing-NULL
> qcow2.virtualsize=741212160
> virtualsize=741212160
> qcow2.size=741212160
> 
> 
> Here, we cannot have id=NULL in template.properties. That is why we throw
> NumberFormatException. I will mark this bug "Not a Bug".

I like those types of bugs!  They are easier to resolve...  

Thanks Min!

> 
> Thanks
> -min
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/21/13 1:25 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:
> 
> >Hi all,
> >
> >KVM agent dev folks - We need someone to take on CLOUDSTACK-1764 please!
> >
> >Summary:
> >
> >ListTemplateCommand failed with java.lang.NumberFormatException and
> >failed to create default template
> >
> >The relevant part of the log seems to show that it's in the agent:
> >
> >2013-03-21 04:40:08,130 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
> >(AgentConnectTaskPool-4:null) Details from executing class
> >com.cloud.agent.api.storage.ListTemplateCommand:
> >java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "NULL"
> >at
> >java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:
> >48) 
> >at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:410)
> >at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:468)
> >at
> >com.cloud.storage.template.TemplateLocation.getTemplateInfo(TemplateLocati
> >on.java:161) 
> >at
> >com.cloud.storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl.gatherTemplateInfo(Download
> >ManagerImpl.java:744)
> >at
> >com.cloud.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource.execute(NfsSecondar
> >yStorageResource.java:1118)
> >at
> >com.cloud.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource.executeRequest(NfsS
> >econdaryStorageResource.java:191)
> >at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:525)
> >at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:852)
> >at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:83)
> >at
> >java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.
> >java:886) 
> >at
> >java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java
> >:908) 
> >at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> >
> >
> >Anyone can assign the bug to themselves!
> >
> >-chip
> 
> 

Reply via email to