This is not an issue with code, template.properties in QA secondary
storage folder is incorrect, see below:

[root@nfs2 3]# more template.properties
filename=c0c94bfc-15c2-4e7f-9a2e-aec541df4cc1.qcow2
description=SystemVM Template
checksum=
hvm=false
size=741212160
qcow2=true
id=NULL
public=true
qcow2.filename=c0c94bfc-15c2-4e7f-9a2e-aec541df4cc1.qcow2
uniquename=routing-NULL
qcow2.virtualsize=741212160
virtualsize=741212160
qcow2.size=741212160


Here, we cannot have id=NULL in template.properties. That is why we throw
NumberFormatException. I will mark this bug "Not a Bug".

Thanks
-min



On 3/21/13 1:25 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>KVM agent dev folks - We need someone to take on CLOUDSTACK-1764 please!
>
>Summary:
>
>ListTemplateCommand failed with java.lang.NumberFormatException and
>failed to create default template
>
>The relevant part of the log seems to show that it's in the agent:
>
>2013-03-21 04:40:08,130 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
>(AgentConnectTaskPool-4:null) Details from executing class
>com.cloud.agent.api.storage.ListTemplateCommand:
>java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "NULL"
>at
>java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:
>48) 
>at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:410)
>at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:468)
>at
>com.cloud.storage.template.TemplateLocation.getTemplateInfo(TemplateLocati
>on.java:161) 
>at
>com.cloud.storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl.gatherTemplateInfo(Download
>ManagerImpl.java:744)
>at
>com.cloud.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource.execute(NfsSecondar
>yStorageResource.java:1118)
>at
>com.cloud.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource.executeRequest(NfsS
>econdaryStorageResource.java:191)
>at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:525)
>at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:852)
>at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:83)
>at
>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.
>java:886) 
>at
>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java
>:908) 
>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
>
>
>Anyone can assign the bug to themselves!
>
>-chip

Reply via email to