Ok then Gabriele I'll let you do the release at your leisure, there's no hurry.
Even if you don't automate everything or most of it, please keep a list of commands you run (basically a terminal log) that would be nearly as useful to me. Thanks, Florent On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Gabriele Columbro <gabri...@apache.org> wrote: > As Florian says [1] is deprecated and should just be removed. > > This [2] is the latest updated documentation (maven based), but it’s also a > bit outdated (or there are manual steps not overly documented). > > I had a target to make the release fully automated before handing it off > (ideally post 1.0), but honestly won’t get to it any soon. So if we want to > do another 0.x release, Florian, you can try to use [2] as a basis but YMMV. > > Happy to maybe have one last chance to fix it myself, but will have to be > towards end of October. > > Thanks, > > Gab > > > [1] > https://chemistry.apache.org/internal/opencmis-release-documentation.html > [2] > https://chemistry.apache.org/internal/opencmis-maven-release-documentation.html > — > > Gabriele Columbro > Sr. Product Manager, Core Platform / API > twitter: @mindthegabz > > “Keyboard not found. Press F1 to continue" > > On Oct 8, 2015, at 11:10 AM, Florian Müller <f...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Florent, > > there is release documentation [1], but it is outdated. OpenCMIS and the > Apache release process have changed. > I guess you have to follow the Apache release policy [2]. Gab did the last > releases. Maybe he can provide a short checklist. > > > - Florian > > > > [1] > https://chemistry.apache.org/internal/opencmis-release-documentation.html > [2] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > > > Hi Florian, > I can take over release management. > Is there a checklist of shell/maven/svn commands to run to prepare the > release candidate and then do the release? > Florent > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Florian Müller <f...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi, > A 0.14.0 release would work for me. Would someone take over the release > management? > If we are ready for 1.0 is up to the community. I would prefer at least one > more intermediated release to make sure that the Web Services changes > (JAX-WS RI -> CXF) work for most users. > @Michael: Please open improvement requests in JIRA and elaborate on your > requirements. > Wishes and bugs we don't know cannot be implemented or fixed. > - Florian > > Hi, > I'm in favour of frequent release, so a 0.14 release is fine for me. > However, for a 1.0 there are some things i would like to see :) > A quick list, that needs some more elaboration: > - java api more geared towards browser binding > - less internal extra service calls > - custom query params support > - rate limiting remote calls for TCK > Michael > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Florent Guillaume <f...@nuxeo.com> wrote: > > Hi, > There have been a number of small bugfixes committed since the last > 0.13 release in April. Should we release a new version? Is it time to > switch to 1.0 or are there more things we want to do before that? > Cheers, > Florent > -- > Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo > Open Source Content Management Platform for Business Apps > http://www.nuxeo.com http://community.nuxeo.com > > > -- Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
