As Florian says [1] is deprecated and should just be removed. This [2] is the latest updated documentation (maven based), but it’s also a bit outdated (or there are manual steps not overly documented).
I had a target to make the release fully automated before handing it off (ideally post 1.0), but honestly won’t get to it any soon. So if we want to do another 0.x release, Florian, you can try to use [2] as a basis but YMMV. Happy to maybe have one last chance to fix it myself, but will have to be towards end of October. Thanks, Gab [1] https://chemistry.apache.org/internal/opencmis-release-documentation.html [2] https://chemistry.apache.org/internal/opencmis-maven-release-documentation.html — Gabriele Columbro Sr. Product Manager, Core Platform / API twitter: @mindthegabz “Keyboard not found. Press F1 to continue" > On Oct 8, 2015, at 11:10 AM, Florian Müller <f...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Florent, > > there is release documentation [1], but it is outdated. OpenCMIS and the > Apache release process have changed. > I guess you have to follow the Apache release policy [2]. Gab did the last > releases. Maybe he can provide a short checklist. > > > - Florian > > > > [1] https://chemistry.apache.org/internal/opencmis-release-documentation.html > [2] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > > >> Hi Florian, >> I can take over release management. >> Is there a checklist of shell/maven/svn commands to run to prepare the >> release candidate and then do the release? >> Florent >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Florian Müller <f...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> A 0.14.0 release would work for me. Would someone take over the release >>> management? >>> If we are ready for 1.0 is up to the community. I would prefer at least one >>> more intermediated release to make sure that the Web Services changes >>> (JAX-WS RI -> CXF) work for most users. >>> @Michael: Please open improvement requests in JIRA and elaborate on your >>> requirements. >>> Wishes and bugs we don't know cannot be implemented or fixed. >>> - Florian >>>> Hi, >>>> I'm in favour of frequent release, so a 0.14 release is fine for me. >>>> However, for a 1.0 there are some things i would like to see :) >>>> A quick list, that needs some more elaboration: >>>> - java api more geared towards browser binding >>>> - less internal extra service calls >>>> - custom query params support >>>> - rate limiting remote calls for TCK >>>> Michael >>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Florent Guillaume <f...@nuxeo.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> There have been a number of small bugfixes committed since the last >>>>> 0.13 release in April. Should we release a new version? Is it time to >>>>> switch to 1.0 or are there more things we want to do before that? >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Florent >>>>> -- >>>>> Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo >>>>> Open Source Content Management Platform for Business Apps >>>>> http://www.nuxeo.com http://community.nuxeo.com >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
