[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAUSEWAY-3297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Keir Haywood updated CAUSEWAY-3297:
------------------------------------------
Component/s: ValueTypes asciidoc
(was: ValueTypes)
> Transitive Dependency not honored with
> causeway-valuetypes-asciidoc-persistence-jdo
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAUSEWAY-3297
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAUSEWAY-3297
> Project: Causeway
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: ValueTypes asciidoc
> Reporter: Andi Huber
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.0-RC1
>
>
> Brian:
> I isolated the error in my project that was causing this. It was in the
> order of dependencies, and for a dependency that it seems I don't need to
> declare explicitly any more. If I add:
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.causeway.valuetypes</groupId>
>
> <artifactId>causeway-valuetypes-asciidoc-persistence-jdo</artifactId>
> </dependency>
> at the top of the simpleapp-jdo webapp dependencies, beneath the simple
> module dependency, it fails to bring in org.webjars:bootstrap . If this
> dependency is further down, the dependency for bootstrap is brought in
> correctly.
> Dan:
> I have on occasion seen warning messages in IntelliJ saying that because of
> an error in such-and-such a pom, its transitive dependencies won't be
> included. So maybe that's the issue, that
> causeway-valuetypes-asciidoc-persistence-jdo --[depends upon]-->
> causeway-valuetypes-asciidoc-ui (or similar) --[depends
> upon]-->asciidoctor-->webjars ... and that there's an error in one of the
> causeway poms somehow. That would explain the symptom that Brian is seeing,
> I think.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
