vote failed with a binding veto.
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 11:31, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: > If I were to vote on this, it would be -1 (non-binding) due to >> non-compliance with ASF policy on releases. >> >> I checked: >> - signatures and hashes are correct >> - It looks like there might be compiled code in the release? [1][2] >> - LICENSE is misisng some 3rd party code license information [5] This >> contains code "Copyright DataStax, Inc." under ALv2, python-smhasher under >> MIT, OrderedDict under MIT (copyright Raymond Hettinger) and code from >> MagnetoDB under ALv2. >> - LICENSE has no mention of 3rd party CRC code in [10] >> - Note that any code under CC 4.0 is incompatible with the ALv2. [11] >> - LICENSE also doesn't mention this file [9] >> - In LICENSE LongTimSort.java incorrectly mentions two different >> copyright owners >> - In LICENSE, AbstractGuavaIterator.java is incorrectly mentioned as >> AbstractIterator.java >> - NOTICE seems OK but may also be missing some things due to misisng 3rd >> party code in LICENSE under ALv2 >> - Files are misisng ASF headers [3][4][6][7][8] are these 3rd party files? >> - I didn't try compiling from the source >> > > > I'll formalise that -1 > There's a few things here for us to fix, thanks for spending the time to > find them. >
