Peter, thanks for your message.You are receiving these emails because your address is subscribed to
the Apache Cassandra "dev@" developer mailing list. You can unsubscribe from this list by
sending an email to dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org. Subscribers to the mailing list are not
able to take this action on others' behalf.More information on the project's mailing lists and how to
join/leave them is here: https://cassandra.apache.org/_/community.htmlCheers,– ScottOn Jul 26, 2023,
at 7:11 AM, C. Scott Andreas <sc...@paradoxica.net> wrote:Can you say more about the shape of
your concern?JCA/JCE conformance and correctness of the functions implemented are a responsibility of
the ACCP/Corretto test suite (link). These are thoroughly exercised by Amazon and bundled into the
Corretto JDK distribution Amazon ships as well.With regard to Cassandra, the hash and cryptographic
functions utilized in ACCP are also thoroughly exercised by Cassandra’s unit and in-JVM dtest suite.I
wouldn’t propose fragmenting our build into a matrix of JDK x arch x ACCP/no, in the same way that we
wouldn’t for tcnative vs. not.- ScottOn Jul 26, 2023, at 6:48 AM, Mick Semb Wever
<m...@apache.org> wrote:So if a service is not there it will just search where it is next. I
completely forgot this aspect of it ... Folks from Corretto forgot to mention this behavior as well,
interesting. It is not as we are going to use this _as the only provider_.I'm still uncomfortable
assuming upgrades work without having the appropriate tests in place. That's the crux for me.
Existing JCE tests (with and without accp) should cover this?
