Jeremiah, that’s my understanding as well. ACCP accelerates a subset of functions and delegates the rest.
In years of using ACCP with Cassandra, I have yet to see an issue - or any case in which adopting ACCP was anything other than a strict benefit. - Scott > On Jul 26, 2023, at 5:33 AM, J. D. Jordan <jeremiah.jor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I thought the crypto providers were supposed to “ask the next one down the > line” if something is not supported? Have you tried some unsupported thing > and seen it break? My understanding of the providers being an ordered list > was that isn’t supposed to happen. > > -Jeremiah > >>> On Jul 26, 2023, at 3:23 AM, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> That means that if somebody is on 4.0 and they upgrade to 5.0, if they use >>> some ciphers / protocols / algorithms which are not in Corretto, it might >>> break their upgrade. >> >> >> >> If there's any risk of breaking upgrades we have to go with (2). We support >> a variation of JCE configurations, and I don't see we have the test coverage >> in place to de-risk it other than going with (2). >> >> Once the yaml configuration is in place we can then change the default in >> the next major version 6.0. >> >>
