Deprecation sounds good to me, but I am not completely sure in which
version we can do it. If it is possible to add a deprecation warning in the
4.x series or at least 4.1.x - I vote for that.

On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 12:14, Jacek Lewandowski <lewandowski.ja...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Is it possible to deprecate it in the 4.1.x patch release? :)
>
>
> - - -- --- ----- -------- -------------
> Jacek Lewandowski
>
>
> czw., 9 mar 2023 o 18:11 Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
>> This is my feeling too, but I think we should accomplish this by
>> deprecating it first.  I don't expect anything will change after the
>> deprecation period.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Brandon
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 11:09 AM Jacek Lewandowski
>> <lewandowski.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I vote for removing it entirely.
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > - - -- --- ----- -------- -------------
>> > Jacek Lewandowski
>> >
>> >
>> > czw., 9 mar 2023 o 18:07 Miklosovic, Stefan <
>> stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com> napisał(a):
>> >>
>> >> Derek,
>> >>
>> >> I have couple more points ... I do not think that extracting it to a
>> separate repository is "win". That code is on Hadoop 1.0.3. We would be
>> spending a lot of work on extracting it just to extract 10 years old code
>> with occasional updates (in my humble opinion just to make it compilable
>> again if the code around changes). What good is in that? We would have one
>> more place to take care of ... Now we at least have it all in one place.
>> >>
>> >> I believe we have four options:
>> >>
>> >> 1) leave it there so it will be like this is for next years with
>> questionable and diminishing usage
>> >> 2) update it to Hadoop 3.3 (I wonder who is going to do that)
>> >> 3) 2) and extract it to a separate repository but if we do 2) we can
>> just leave it there
>> >> 4) remove it
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________________
>> >> From: Derek Chen-Becker <de...@chen-becker.org>
>> >> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 15:55
>> >> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: Role of Hadoop code in Cassandra 5.0
>> >>
>> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links
>> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I think the question isn't "Who ... is still using that?" but more
>> "are we actually going to support it?" If we're on a version that old it
>> would appear that we've basically abandoned it, although there do appear to
>> have been refactoring (for other things) commits in the last couple of
>> years. I would be in favor of removal from 5.0, but at the very least,
>> could it be moved into a separate repo/package so that it's not pulling a
>> relatively large dependency subtree from Hadoop into our main codebase?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >>
>> >> Derek
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 6:44 AM Miklosovic, Stefan <
>> stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com<mailto:stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com>> wrote:
>> >> Hi list,
>> >>
>> >> I stumbled upon Hadoop package again. I think there was some
>> discussion about the relevancy of Hadoop code some time ago but I would
>> like to ask this again.
>> >>
>> >> Do you think Hadoop code (1) is still relevant in 5.0? Who in the
>> industry is still using that?
>> >>
>> >> We might drop a lot of code and some Hadoop dependencies too (3) (even
>> their scope is "provided"). The version of Hadoop we build upon is 1.0.3
>> which was released 10 years ago. This code does not have any tests nor
>> documentation on the website.
>> >>
>> >> There seems to be issues like this (2) and it seems like the solution
>> is to, basically, use Spark Cassandra connector instead which I would say
>> is quite reasonable.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >>
>> >> (1)
>> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/hadoop
>> >> (2) https://lists.apache.org/thread/jdy5hdc2l7l29h04dqol5ylroqos1y2p
>> >> (3)
>> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/.build/parent-pom-template.xml#L507-L589
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> +---------------------------------------------------------------+
>> >> | Derek Chen-Becker                                             |
>> >> | GPG Key available at https://keybase.io/dchenbecker and       |
>> >> | https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=derek%40chen-becker.org |
>> >> | Fngrprnt: EB8A 6480 F0A3 C8EB C1E7  7F42 AFC5 AFEE 96E4 6ACC  |
>> >> +---------------------------------------------------------------+
>> >>
>>
>

Reply via email to