There’s another 1-line fix needed with the patch, and some tests, that I (or 
someone else) can likely post later today. It might be worth also giving Matt 
and Marianne a day or two to run some further tests to confirm everything is 
working as expected.

> On 6 Dec 2022, at 09:15, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Marianne and Matt, 
>  are you saying that this v1->v2 performance degradation is more than just 
> CASSANDRA-18086 ? 
> If so, what's the eta for a ticket created for it? 
> 
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 00:07, Marianne Lyne Manaog <marianne.man...@ieee.org> 
>> wrote:
>> Following on what Matt said:
>>      - Here is the link to the Cassandra repo with the bugfix of wait time 
>> from ms to ns: 
>> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...marianne-manaog:cassandra:bugfix/wait-from-ms-to-ns
>> 
>>      - the Paxos configuration used is:
>>       paxos_contention_wait_randomizer: uniform
>>       paxos_contention_min_wait: 0
>>       paxos_contention_max_wait: 100ms
>> 
>>      - V1 and V2 have the same configurations except for paxos_variant: 
>> which changes accordingly
>> 
>>      Results: V1 (100 partitions)
>>      - Average read: 28948
>>      - Standard Deviation: 416.271
>>      - Coefficient of variance: 1.44%
>>      - Average write: 19248
>>      - Standard Deviation:158.595
>>      - Coefficient of variance:0.82%
>> 
>>      Results: V2 (100 partitions)
>>      - Average read: 12307
>>      - Standard Deviation: 2367.473
>>      - Coefficient of variance: 19.24%
>>      - Average write: 5780
>>      - Standard Deviation: 1154.261
>>      - Coefficient of variance: 19.97%
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 1:50 PM Matt Fleming <m...@codeblueprint.co.uk> 
>>> wrote:
>>> Me and Marianne are also still chasing a performance issue with Paxos v2 
>>> when compared with v1. We
>>> see way more contention on v2 for a LOCAL_SERIALIZABLE workload that 
>>> writes/reads to only 100 
>>> partitions (v2 performs better for higher partition counts). We're still 
>>> investigating what's going
>>> on.
>>> 
>>> Should that be a -1 vote? I'm not sure :)
>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 at 11:37, Benedict <bened...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> -0 
>>>> 
>>>> CASSANDRA-18086 should probably be fixed and merged first, as Paxos v2 
>>>> will be unlikely to work well for users without it. Either that or we need 
>>>> to update NEWS.txt to mention it.
>>>> 
>>>>>> On 5 Dec 2022, at 11:01, Aleksey Yeshchenko <alek...@apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 5 Dec 2022, at 10:17, Benjamin Lerer <ble...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Le lun. 5 déc. 2022 à 11:02, Berenguer Blasi <berenguerbl...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 5/12/22 10:53, guo Maxwell wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org>于2022年12月5日 周一下午5:33写道:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.1.0 GA for release.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> sha1: b807f97b37933fac251020dbd949ee8ef245b158
>>>>>>>>> Git: 
>>>>>>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.1.0-tentative
>>>>>>>>> Maven Artifacts: 
>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1281/org/apache/cassandra/cassandra-all/4.1.0/
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The Source and Build Artifacts, and the Debian and RPM packages and 
>>>>>>>>> repositories, are available here: 
>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cassandra/4.1.0/
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who 
>>>>>>>>> has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are 
>>>>>>>>> considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding 
>>>>>>>>> +1s and no -1's.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [1]: CHANGES.txt: 
>>>>>>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.txt;hb=refs/tags/4.1.0-tentative
>>>>>>>>> [2]: NEWS.txt: 
>>>>>>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=blob_plain;f=NEWS.txt;hb=refs/tags/4.1.0-tentative
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> you are the apple of my eye !
>>>>> 

Reply via email to