Me and Marianne are also still chasing a performance issue with Paxos v2
when compared with v1. We
see way more contention on v2 for a LOCAL_SERIALIZABLE workload that
writes/reads to only 100
partitions (v2 performs better for higher partition counts). We're still
investigating what's going
on.

Should that be a -1 vote? I'm not sure :)

On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 at 11:37, Benedict <bened...@apache.org> wrote:

> -0
>
> CASSANDRA-18086 should probably be fixed and merged first, as Paxos v2
> will be unlikely to work well for users without it. Either that or we need
> to update NEWS.txt to mention it.
>
> On 5 Dec 2022, at 11:01, Aleksey Yeshchenko <alek...@apple.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 5 Dec 2022, at 10:17, Benjamin Lerer <ble...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Le lun. 5 déc. 2022 à 11:02, Berenguer Blasi <berenguerbl...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> +1
>> On 5/12/22 10:53, guo Maxwell wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org>于2022年12月5日 周一下午5:33写道:
>>
>>>
>>> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.1.0 GA for release.
>>>
>>> sha1: b807f97b37933fac251020dbd949ee8ef245b158
>>> Git:
>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.1.0-tentative
>>> Maven Artifacts:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1281/org/apache/cassandra/cassandra-all/4.1.0/
>>>
>>> The Source and Build Artifacts, and the Debian and RPM packages and
>>> repositories, are available here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cassandra/4.1.0/
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has
>>> tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered
>>> binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's.
>>>
>>> [1]: CHANGES.txt:
>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.txt;hb=refs/tags/4.1.0-tentative
>>> [2]: NEWS.txt:
>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=blob_plain;f=NEWS.txt;hb=refs/tags/4.1.0-tentative
>>>
>> --
>> you are the apple of my eye !
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to