I must admit, I've not dived into Jira's much yet (I've done one, I think), but if you think a separate Jira issue type would help, I'm all for it, Mick!
*Topic review* One thing that I'd like to highlight from the content process wiki page is the need to review the topics we would like to cover as a community. I'm particularly referring to the technical/feature topics and the correct editorial approach we want to take. The list on the Google Doc (the first tab) was something I inherited about a year ago and I expect it needs refreshing. It would be great to see a few knowledgeable community members hack on the list or, if it's easier, I can arrange a quick call, individually or as a group, to flesh out what people think we should cover in 2022: Here's the doc (note: set to comment for all now it's in the wild on the wiki, but Slack me if you need edit rights): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bMRNB0KJRN9WsMcfoX8BFwuFDX56QRBKpbQ0N8Zvy5k/edit?pli=1#gid=386721509 Thanks, On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 4:09 PM Chris Thornett <ch...@constantia.io> wrote: > Thanks, Mick! I’ll make those amends. > > > > On 2022/02/17 14:38:12 Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > > * Content pipeline overview > > > > > > > > > > > > > Awesome stuff Chris! > > > > > > Under the "Pull Request Approval" section there's some inaccuracies, if > we > > > presume staging == cassandra.staged.apache.org. > > > > > > The content is pushed to staging *after* it is committed to trunk (and is > > > automatic). The check on staging should not be used as part of the review > > > process, just a final sanity check before pushing live. Step (2) is (when > > > needed) a local docker run to do final QA testing before the PR is > approved > > > and committed to trunk. > > > > > > In exceptional cases a committer can commit the generated content to the > > > asf-staging branch without committing to trunk. But this would only be > when > > > local rendering is not expected to match cassandra.staged.apache.org > (which > > > shouldn't happen, but e.g. .htaccess) > > > > > > Also worth noting, with step (2) involving "a local docker run to do > final > > > QA testing" this is waiting on some fixes where local generation isn't > > > identical to how CI is generating it: CASSANDRA-17374 > > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows > > >
