RE: Re: [FOR REVIEW] Content Pipeline Process wiki

[Chris Thornett]

Thanks, Mick! I’ll make those amends.   On 2022/02/17 14:38:12 Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > * Content pipeline overview > > > > > Awesome stuff Chris! > > Under the "Pull Request Approval" section there's some inaccuracies, if we > presume staging == cassandra.staged.apache.org. > > The content is pushed to staging *after* it is committed to trunk (and is > automatic). The check on staging should not be used as part of the review > process, just a final sanity check before pushing live. Step (2) is (when > needed) a local docker run to do final QA testing before the PR is approved > and committed to trunk. > > In exceptional cases a committer can commit the generated content to the > asf-staging branch without committing to trunk. But this would only be when > local rendering is not expected to match cassandra.staged.apache.org (which > shouldn't happen, but e.g. .htaccess) > > Also worth noting, with step (2) involving "a local docker run to do final > QA testing" this is waiting on some fixes where local generation isn't > identical to how CI is generating it: CASSANDRA-17374 > Sent from Mail for Windows