On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 2:38 AM Joshua McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
> > The obvious core responsibility of the website should be to ASLv2 > permissively licensed Apache Cassandra and secondarily to CQL as a protocol > IMO. I don't think we as a project should be tracking derivative works, > forks, or other things built on top of the code-base and certainly not > things with wildly varied licensing (AGPL, proprietary closed, etc). > > To go that route we either become fully inclusive of everything or become > Kingmakers, and either way there's the consequence of inconsistent levels > of vetting, maintenance, and dilution of what it means to "be Cassandra". > There's plenty of other websites for other projects and everyone has access > to search engines. > This makes sense to me as a line in the sand to draw if we are going down a strict path. It would be up to whoever wants to be added to the list to demonstrate this is the case. There would still be some degree of honesty required as well on the service providers part.
