It really boils down just to a simple "problem" to have enough
committers to look at it over a (preferably) shorter period of time
and make that feedback loop shorter. That's it. You might have the
best guides and whatever but if a dust settles at it no guide will
make it happen.

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 14:14, Benedict Elliott Smith
<bened...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I think that all of the bootcamps we ran in the past produced precisely zero 
> new contributors.
>
> I wonder if it would be more impactful to produce slightly more permanent 
> content, such as step-by-step guides to producing a simple patch for some 
> subsystem. Perhaps if people want to, a recording could be created of going 
> through that guide as well.
>
> That said, if there are new contributors actively trying to participate, 
> organising a periodic group chat to talk through one of the issues that they 
> may be working on together as a group with an active contributor might make 
> sense, and be more targeted in focus?
>
>
> On 27/04/2021, 12:45, "Manish G" <manish.c.ghildi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Contributor bootcamps can really help new people like me.
>
>     On Tue, Apr 27, 2021, 5:08 PM Jeremy Hanna <jeremy.hanna1...@gmail.com>
>     wrote:
>
>     > One thing we've done in the past is contributor bootcamps along with the
>     > the new contributor guide and the LHF complexity tickets.  
> Unfortunately, I
>     > don't know that the contributor bootcamps were ever recorded.
>     > Presentations were done to introduce people to the codebase generally (I
>     > think Gary did this at one point) as well as specific parts of the
>     > codebase, such as compaction.  What if we broke up the codebase into
>     > categories and people could volunteer to do a short introduction to that
>     > part of the codebase in the form of a video screenshare.  I don't think
>     > this would take the place of mentoring someone, but if we had 
> introductions
>     > to different parts of the codebase, I think it would lower the bar for
>     > interested contributors and scale the existing group more easily.  
> Besides
>     > the codebase itself, we could also introduce things like CI practices or
>     > testing or documentation.
>     >
>     > > On Apr 24, 2021, at 12:49 AM, Benjamin Lerer <ble...@apache.org> 
> wrote:
>     > >
>     > > Hi Everybody,The Apache Cassandra project always had some issues to
>     > > attract and retain new contributors. I think it would be great to 
> change
>     > > this.According to the "How to Attract New Contributors" blog post (
>     > > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/how-attract-new-contributors) having a
>     > good
>     > > onboarding process is a critical part. How to contribute should be
>     > obvious
>     > > and contributing should be as easy as possible for all the different
>     > types
>     > > of contributions: code, documentation, web-site or help with our CI
>     > > infrastructure.I would love to hear about your ideas on how we can
>     > improve
>     > > things.If you are new in the community, do not hesitate to share your
>     > > experience and your suggestions on what we can do to make it easier 
> for
>     > you
>     > > to contribute.
>     >
>     >
>     > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
>     > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
>     >
>     >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to