It does raise the bar to critiquing the document though, but perhaps that's
also a feature.
Perhaps we can first discuss the purpose of the document? It seems to be a mix
of mission statement for the project, as well as your own near term roadmap?
Should we interpret it only as an advertisement of your own view of the
problems the project faces, as a start to dialogue, or is the purpose to
solicit feedback?
Would it be helpful to work towards a similar document the whole community
endorses, with a shared mission statement, and a (perhaps loosely defined)
shared roadmap?
I'd like to call out some specific things in the document that I am personally
excited by: the project has long lacked a coherent, repeatable approach to
performance testing and regressions; combined with easy visualisation tools
this would be a huge win. The FQL sampling with data distribution inference is
also something that has been discussed privately elsewhere, and would be hugely
advantageous to the former, so that we can discover representative workloads.
Thanks for taking the time to put this together, and start this dialogue.
On 13/07/2020, 23:41, "Joshua McKenzie" <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Can you please allow comments on the doc so we can leave feedback.
>
> Doc is view only; figured we could keep this to the ML.
>
That's a feature, not a bug.
Happy to chat here or on slack w/anyone. This is a complex topic so
long-form or high bandwidth communication is a better fit than gdoc
comments. They rapidly become unwieldy.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 6:17 PM sankalp kohli <kohlisank...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Can you please allow comments on the doc so we can leave feedback.
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:16 PM Joshua McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Link:
> >
> >
>
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ktuBWpD2NLurB9PUvmbwGgrXsgnyU58koOseZAfaFBQ/edit#
> >
> >
> > Myself and a few other contributors are working with this point of view
> as
> > our frame of where we're going to work on improving testing on the
> project.
> > I figured it might be useful to foster collaboration more broadly in the
> > community as well as provide people with the opportunity to discuss work
> > they're doing they may not yet have had a chance to bring up or open
> > source. While fallout is already open-sourced, expect the schema
> anonymizer
> > and some of the cassandra-diff + nosqlbench framework effort to be
> > open-sourced / openly worked on soon. Anyone that's interested in
> > collaborating, that would be highly welcome.
> >
> > Doc is view only; figured we could keep this to the ML.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > ~Josh
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
